This site is full of FREE ebooks - Project Gutenberg Australia

Title: As a Thief in the Night (1928)
Author: R. Austin Freeman
* A Project Gutenberg of Australia eBook *
eBook No.: 0700851.txt
Language:  English
Date first posted: July 2007
Date most recently updated: July 2007

This eBook was produced by: Jon Jermey

Project Gutenberg of Australia eBooks are created from printed editions
which are in the public domain in Australia, unless a copyright notice
is included. We do NOT keep any eBooks in compliance with a particular
paper edition.

Copyright laws are changing all over the world. Be sure to check the
copyright laws for your country before downloading or redistributing this
file.

This eBook is made available at no cost and with almost no restrictions
whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms
of the Project Gutenberg of Australia License which may be viewed online at
http://gutenberg.net.au/licence.html

To contact Project Gutenberg of Australia go to http://gutenberg.net.au

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Title: As a Thief in the Night (1928)
Author: R. Austin Freeman



CONTENTS

 1 THE INVALID
 2 BARBARA MONKHOUSE COMES HOME
 3 A SHOCK FOR THE MOURNERS
 4 "HOW, WHEN AND WHERE--"
 5 MADELINE'S ORDEAL
 6 THE VERDICT
 7 THE SEARCH WARRANT
 8 THORNDYKE SPEAKS BLUNTLY
 9 SUPERINTENDENT MILLER IS PUZZLED
10 A GREEK GIFT
11 THE RIVALS
12 THORNDYKE CHALLENGES THE EVIDENCE
13 RUPERT MAKES SOME DISCOVERIES
14 RUPERT CONFIDES IN THORNDYKE
15 A PURSUIT AND A DISCOVERY
16 BARBARA'S MESSAGE
17 THORNDYKE RETRACES THE TRAIL
18 THE FINAL PROOF




CHAPTER ONE

THE INVALID

Looking back on events by the light of experience I perceive clearly that
the thunder-cloud which burst on me and on those who were dear to me had
not gathered unseen. It is true that it had rolled up swiftly; that the
premonitory mutterings, now so distinct but then so faint and
insignificant, gave but a brief warning. But that was of little
consequence, since whatever warnings there were passed unheeded, as
warnings commonly do, being susceptible of interpretation only by means
of the subsequent events which they foreshadowed.

The opening scene of the tragedy--if I had but realized it--was the
arrival of the Reverend Amos Monkhouse from his far-away Yorkshire parish
at the house of his brother Harold. I happened to be there at the time;
and though it was not my concern, since Harold had a secretary, I
received the clergyman when he was announced. We knew one another well
enough by name though we had never met, and it was with some interest and
curiosity that I looked at the keen-faced, sturdy, energetic-looking
parson and contrasted him with his physically frail and rather
characterless brother. He looked at me, too, curiously and with a certain
appearance of surprise, which did not diminish when I told him who I was.

"Ha!" said he, "yes, Mr Mayfield. I am glad to have the opportunity of
making your acquaintance. I have heard a good deal about you from Harold
and Barbara. Now I can fit you with a visible personality. By the way,
the maid tells me that Barbara is not at home."

"No, she is away on her travels in Kent."

"In Kent!" he repeated, raising his eyebrows.

"Yes, on one of her political expeditions; organizing some sort of
women's emancipation movement. I dare say you have heard about it."

He nodded a little impatiently. "Yes. Then I assume that Harold is not so
ill as I had supposed?"

I was inclined to be evasive; for, to be quite candid, I had thought more
than once that Barbara might properly have given a little less attention
to her political hobbies and a little more to her sick husband. So I
replied cautiously:

"I really don't quite know what his condition is. You see, when a man has
chronically bad health, one rather loses count. Harold has his ups and
downs, but he always looks pretty poorly. Just now, I should say he is
rather below his average."

"Ha! Well, perhaps I had better go up and have a look at him. The maid
has told him that I am here. I wonder if you would be so kind as to show
me the way to his room. I have not been in this house before."

I conducted him up to the door of the bedroom and then returned to the
library to wait for him and hear what he thought of the invalid. And now
that the question had been raised, I was not without a certain
uneasiness. What I had said was true enough. When a man is always ailing
one gets to take his ill-health for granted and to assume that it will go
on without any significant change. One repeats the old saying of "the
creaking gate" and perhaps makes unduly light of habitual illness. Might
it be that Harold was being a little neglected? He had certainly looked
bad enough when I had called on him that morning. Was it possible that he
was really seriously ill? Perhaps in actual danger?

I had just asked myself this question when the door was opened abruptly
and the clergyman strode into the room. Something in his expression--a
mingling, as it seemed, of anger and alarm--rather startled me;
nevertheless I asked him calmly enough how he found his brother. He
stared at me, almost menacingly, for a second or two; then slowly and
with harsh emphasis he replied: "I am shocked at the change in him. I am
horrified. Why, good God, Sir! the man is dying!"

"I think that can hardly be," I objected. "The doctor saw him this
morning and did not hint at anything of the sort. He thought he was not
very well but he made no suggestion as to there being any danger."

"How long has the doctor been attending him?"

"For something like twenty years, I believe; so by this time he ought to
understand the patient's--"

"Tut-tut," the parson interrupted, impatiently, "what did you say
yourself but a few minutes ago? One loses count of the chronic invalid.
He exhausts our attention until, at last, we fail to observe the obvious.
What is wanted is a fresh eye. Can you give me the doctor's address?
Because, if you can, I will call on him and arrange a consultation. I
told Harold that I wanted a second opinion and he made no objection; in
fact he seemed rather relieved. If we get a really first-class physician,
we may save him yet."

"I think you are taking an unduly gloomy view of Harold's condition,"
said I. "At any rate, I hope so. But I entirely agree with you as to the
advisability of having further advice. I know where Dr Dimsdale lives so
if you like I will walk round with you."

He accepted my offer gladly and we set forth at once, walking briskly
along the streets, each of us wrapped in thought and neither speaking for
some time. Presently I ventured to remark:

"Strictly, I suppose, we ought to have consulted Barbara before seeking
another opinion."

"I don't see why," he replied. "Harold is a responsible person and has
given his free consent. If Barbara is so little concerned about him as to
go away from home--and for such a trumpery reason, too--I don't see that
we need consider her. Still, as a matter of common civility, I might as
well send her a line. What is her present address?"

"Do you know," I said, shamefacedly, "I am afraid I can't tell you
exactly where she is at the moment. Her permanent address, when she is
away on these expeditions, is the head-quarters of the Women's Friendship
League at Maidstone."

He stopped for a moment and glowered at me with an expression of sheer
amazement. "Do you mean to tell me," he exclaimed, "that she has gone
away, leaving her husband in this condition, and that she is not even
within reach of a telegram?"

"I have no doubt that a telegram or letter would be forwarded to her."

He emitted an angry snort and then demanded: "How long has she been
away?"

"About a fortnight," I admitted, reluctantly.

"A fortnight!" he repeated in angry astonishment. "And all that time
beyond reach of communication! Why the man might have been dead and
buried and she none the wiser!"

"He was much better when she went away," I said, anxious to make the best
of what I felt to be a rather bad case. "In fact, he seemed to be getting
on quite nicely. It is only during the last few days that he has got this
set-back. Of course, Barbara is kept informed as to his condition.
Madeline sends her a letter every few days."

"But, my dear Mr Mayfield," he expostulated, "just consider the state of
affairs in this amazing household. I came to see my brother,
expecting--from the brief letter that I had from him--to find him
seriously ill. And I do find him seriously ill; dangerously ill, I should
say. And what sort of care is being taken of him? His wife is away from
home, amusing herself with her platform fooleries, and has left no
practicable address. His secretary, or whatever you call him,
Wallingford, is not at home. Madeline is, of course, occupied in her work
at the school. Actually, the only person in the house besides the
servants is yourself--a friend of the family but not a member of the
household at all. You must admit that it is a most astonishing and
scandalous state of affairs."

I was saved from the necessity of answering this rather awkward question
by our arrival at Dr Dimsdale's house; and, as it fortunately happened
that the doctor was at home and disengaged, we were shown almost at once
into his consulting room.

I knew Dr Dimsdale quite well and rather liked him though I was not
deeply impressed by his abilities. However, his professional skill was
really no concern of mine, and his social qualities were unexceptionable.
In appearance and manner he had always seemed to me the very type of a
high-class general practitioner, and so he impressed me once more as we
were ushered into his sanctum. He shook hands with me genially, and as I
introduced the Reverend Amos looked at him with a politely questioning
expression. But the clergyman lost no time in making clear the purpose of
his visit; in fact he came to the point with almost brutal abruptness.

"I have just seen my brother for the first time for several months and I
am profoundly shocked at his appearance. I expected to find him ill, but
I did not understand that he was so ill as I find him."

"No," Dr Dimsdale agreed, gravely, "I suppose not. You have caught him at
a rather unfortunate time. He is certainly not so well today."

"Well!" exclaimed Amos. "To me he has the look of a dying man. May I ask
what, exactly, is the matter with him?"

The doctor heaved a patient sigh and put his fingertips together.

"The word 'exactly'," he replied, with a faint smile, "makes your
question a little difficult to answer. There are so many things the
matter with him. For the last twenty years, on and off, I have attended
him, and during the whole of that time his health has been
unsatisfactory--most unsatisfactory. His digestion has always been
defective, his circulation feeble, he has had functional trouble with his
heart, and throughout the winter months, more or less continuous
respiratory troubles--nasal and pulmonary catarrh and sometimes rather
severe bronchitis."

The Reverend Amos nodded impatiently. "Quite so, quite so. But, to come
from the past to the present, what is the matter with him now?"

"That," the doctor replied suavely, "is what I was coming to. I mentioned
the antecedents to account for the consequents. The complaints from which
your brother has suffered in the past have been what are called
functional complaints. But functional disease--if there really is such a
thing--must, in the end, if it goes on long enough, develop into organic
disease. Its effects are cumulative. Each slight illness leaves the
bodily organs a little less fit."

"Yes?"

"Well, that is, I fear, what is happening in your brother's case. The
functional illnesses of the past are tending to take on an organic
character."

"Ha!" snorted the Reverend Amos. "But what is his actual condition now?
To put it bluntly, supposing he were to die tonight, what would you write
on die death certificate?"

"Dear me!" said the doctor. "That is putting it very bluntly. I hope the
occasion will not arise."

"Still, I suppose you don't regard his death as an impossible
contingency?"

"Oh, by no means. Chronic illness confers no immortality, as I have just
been pointing out."

"Then, supposing his death to occur, what would you state to be the
cause?"

Dr Dimsdale's habitual suavity showed a trace of diminution as he
replied: "You are asking a very unusual and hardly admissible question,
Mr Monkhouse. However, I may say that if your brother were to die tonight
he would die from some definite cause, which would be duly set forth in
the certificate. As he is suffering from chronic gastritis, chronic
bronchial catarrh, functional disorder of the heart and several other
morbid conditions, these would be added as contributory causes. But may I
ask what is the object of these very pointed questions?"

"My object," replied Amos, "was to ascertain whether the circumstances
justified a consultation. It seems to me that they do. I am extremely
disturbed about my brother. Would you have any objection to meeting a
consultant?"

"But not in the least. On the contrary, I should be very glad to talk
over this rather indefinite case with an experienced physician who would
come to it with a fresh eye. Of course, the patient's consent would be
necessary."

"He has consented, and he agreed to the consultant whom I proposed--Sir
Robert Detling--if you concurred."

"I do certainly. I could suggest no better man. Shall I arrange with him
or will you?"

"Perhaps I had better," the parson replied, "as I know him fairly well.
We were of the same year at Cambridge. I shall go straight on to him now
and will let you know at once what arrangement he proposes."

"Excellent," said the doctor, rising with all his suavity restored. "I
shall keep tomorrow as free as I can until I hear from you, and I hope he
will be able to manage it so soon. I shall be glad to hear what he thinks
of our patient, and I trust that the consultation may be helpful in the
way of treatment."

He shook our hands heartily and conducted us to the street door, whence
he launched us safely into the street.

"That is a very suave gentleman," Amos remarked as we turned away. "Quite
reasonable, too; but you see for yourself that he has no real knowledge
of the case. He couldn't give the illness an intelligible name."

"It seemed to me that he gave it a good many names, and it may well be
that it is no more than he seems to think; a sort of collective illness,
the resultant of the various complaints that he mentioned. However, we
shall know more when Sir Robert has seen him; and meanwhile, I wouldn't
worry too much about the apparent neglect. Your brother, unlike most
chronic invalids, doesn't hanker for attention. He has all he wants and
he likes to be left alone with his books. Shall you see him again today?"

"Assuredly. As soon as I have arranged matters with Detling I shall let
Dr Dimsdale know what we have settled and I shall then go back and spend
the evening with my brother. Perhaps I shall see you tomorrow?"

"No. I have to run down to Bury St Edmunds tomorrow morning and I shall
probably be there three or four days. But I should very much like to hear
what happens at the consultation. Could you send me a few lines? I shall
be staying at the Angel."

"I will certainly," he replied, halting and raising his umbrella to
signal an approaching omnibus. "Just a short note to let you know what
Sir Robert has to tell us of poor Harold's condition."

He waved his hand, and stepping off the kerb, hopped on to the foot-board
of the omnibus as it slowed own, and vanished into the interior. I stood
for a few moments watching the receding vehicle, half inclined to go back
and take another look at the sick man; but reflecting that his brother
would be presently returning, I abandoned the idea and made my way
instead to the Underground Railway station and there took a ticket for
the Temple.

There is something markedly infectious in states of mind. Hitherto I had
given comparatively little attention to Harold Monkhouse. He was a more
or less chronic invalid, suffering now from one complaint and now from
another, and evidently a source of no particular anxiety either to his
friends or to his doctor. He was always pallid and sickly-looking, and
if, on this particular morning, he had seemed to look more haggard and
ghastly than usual, I had merely noted that he was "not so well today."

But the appearance on the scene of the Reverend Amos had put a rather
different complexion on the affair. His visit to his brother had resulted
in a severe shock, which he had passed on to me; and I had to admit that
our interview with Dr Dimsdale had not been reassuring. For the fact
which had emerged from it was that the doctor could not give the disease
a name.

It was very disquieting. Supposing it should turn out that Harold was
suffering from some grave, even some mortal disease, which ought to have
been detected and dealt with months ago. How should we all feel? How, in
particular, would Barbara feel about the easygoing way in which the
illness had been allowed to drift on? It was an uncomfortable thought;
and though Harold Monkhouse was really no concern of mine, excepting that
he was Barbara's husband, it continued to haunt me as I sat in the
rumbling train and as I walked up from the Temple station to my chambers
in Fig Tree Court.



CHAPTER TWO

BARBARA MONKHOUSE COMES HOME

In the intervals of my business at Bury St Edmunds I gave more than a
passing thought to the man who was lying sick in the house in the quiet
square at Kensington. It was not that I had any very deep feeling for him
as a friend, though I liked him well enough. But the idea had got into my
mind that he had perhaps been treated with something less than ordinary
solicitude; that his illness had been allowed to drift on when possibly
some effective measures might have been taken for his relief. And as it
had never occurred to me to make any suggestions on the matter or to
interest myself particularly in his condition, I was now inclined to
regard myself as a party to the neglect, if there had really been any
culpable failure of attention. I therefore awaited with some anxiety the
letter which Amos had promised to send.

It was not until the morning of my third day at Bury that it arrived; and
when I had opened and read it I found myself even less reassured than I
had expected.

"Dear Mayfield," it ran. "The consultation took place this afternoon and
the result is, in my opinion, highly unsatisfactory. Sir Robert is, at
present, unable to say definitely what is the matter with Harold. He
states that he finds the case extremely obscure and reserves his opinion
until the blood-films and other specimens which he took, have been
examined and reported on by an expert pathologist. But on one point he is
perfectly clear. He regards Harold's condition as extremely grave--even
critical--and he advised me to send a telegram to Barbara insisting on
her immediate return home. Which I have done; and only hope it may reach
her in the course of the day.

"That is all I have to tell you and I think you will agree that it is not
an encouraging report. Medical science must be in a very backward state
if two qualified practitioners--one of them an eminent physician--cannot
between them muster enough professional knowledge to say what is the
matter with a desperately sick man. However, I hope that we shall have a
diagnosis by the time you come back.

"Yours sincerely,

"AMOS MONKHOUSE."

I could not but agree, in the main, that my clerical friend's rather
gloomy view was justified, though I thought that he was a trifle unfair
to the doctors, especially to Sir Robert. Probably a less scientific
practitioner, who would have given the condition some sort of name, would
have been more satisfying to the parson. Meanwhile, I allowed myself to
build on "the blood-films and other specimens" hopes of a definite
discovery which might point the way to some effective treatment.

I despatched my business by the following evening and returned to London
by the night train, arriving at my chambers shortly before midnight. With
some eagerness I emptied the letter-cage in the hope of finding a note
from Amos or Barbara; but there was none, although there were one or two
letters from solicitors which required to be dealt with at once. I read
these through and considered their contents while I was undressing,
deciding to get up early and reply to them so that I might have the
forenoon free; and this resolution I carried out so effectively that by
ten o'clock in the morning I had breakfasted, answered and posted the
letters, and was on my way westward in an Inner Circle train.

It was but a few minutes' walk from South Kensington Station to
Hilborough Square and I covered the short distance more quickly than
usual. Turning into the square, I walked along the pavement on the garden
side, according to my habit, until I was nearly opposite the house. Then
I turned to cross the road and as I did so, looked up at the house. And
at the first glance I stopped short and stared in dismay: for the blinds
were lowered in all the windows. For a couple of seconds I stood and
gazed at this ominous spectacle; then I hurried across the road and.
instinctively avoiding the knocker, gave a gentle pull at the bell.

The door was opened by the housemaid, who looked at me somewhat strangely
but admitted me without a word and shut the door softly behind me. I
glanced at her set face and asked in a low voice: "Why are all the blinds
down, Mabel?"

"Didn't you know, Sir?" she replied, almost in a whisper. "It's the
master--Mr Monkhouse. He passed away in the night. I found him dead when
I went in this morning to draw up the blinds and give him his early tea."

I gazed at the girl in consternation, and after a pause she continued:

"It gave me an awful turn. Sir, for I didn't see, at first, what had
happened. He was lying just as he usually did, and looked as if he had
gone to sleep, reading. He had a book in his hand, resting on the
counterpane, and I could see that his candle-lamp had burned itself right
out. I put his tea on the bedside table and spoke to him, and when he
didn't answer I spoke again a little louder. And then I noticed that he
was perfectly still and looked even paler and more yellow than usual and
I began to feel nervous about him. So I touched his hand: and it was as
cold as stone and as stiff as a wooden hand. Then I felt sure he must be
dead and I ran away and told Miss Norris."

"Miss Norris!" I exclaimed.

"Yes, Sir. Mrs Monkhouse only got home about an hour ago. She was
fearfully upset when she found she was too late. Miss Norris is with her
now, but I expect she'll be awfully glad you've come. She was asking
where you were. Shall I tell her you are here?"

"If you please, Mabel," I replied; and as the girl retired up the stairs
with a stealthy, funereal tread, I backed into the open doorway of the
dining room (avoiding the library, in case Wallingford should be there)
where I remained until Mabel returned with a message asking me to go up.

I think I have seldom felt more uncomfortable than I did as I walked
slowly and softly up the stairs. The worst had happened--at least, so I
thought--and we all stood condemned; but Barbara most of all I tried to
prepare some comforting, condolent phrases, but could think of nothing
but the unexplainable, inexcusable fact that Barbara had other own choice
and for her own purposes, gone away leaving a sick husband and had come
back to find him dead.

As I entered the pleasant little boudoir--now gloomy enough, with its
lowered blinds--the two women rose from the settee on which they had been
sitting together, and Barbara came forward to meet me, holding out both
her hands.

"Rupert!" she exclaimed, "how good of you! But it is like you to be here
just when we have need of you." She took both my hands and continued,
looking rather wildly into my face: "Isn't it an awful thing? Poor, poor
Harold! So patient and uncomplaining! And I so neglectful, so callous! I
shall never, never forgive myself. I have been a selfish, egotistical
brute."

"We are all to blame," I said, since I could not honestly dispute her
self-accusations; "and Dr Dimsdale not the least. Harold has been the
victim of his own patience. Does Amos know?"

"Yes," answered Madeline, "I sent him a telegram at half-past eight. I
should have sent you one, too, but I didn't know that you had come back."

There followed a slightly awkward silence during which I reflected with
some discomfort on the impending arrival of the dead man's brother, which
might occur at any moment. It promised to be a somewhat unpleasant
incident, for Amos alone had gauged the gravity of his brother's
condition, and he was an outspoken man. I only hoped that he would not be
too outspoken.

The almost embarrassing silence was broken by Barbara, who asked me in a
low voice: "Will you go and see him, Rupert?" and added: "You know the
way and I expect you would rather go alone."

I said "yes" as I judged that she did not wish to come with me, and,
walking out of the room, took my way along the corridor to the
well-remembered door, at which I halted for a moment, with an
unreasonable impulse to knock, and then entered. A solemn dimness
pervaded the room, with its lowered blinds, and an unusual silence seemed
to brood over it. But everything was clearly visible in the faint,
diffused light--the furniture, the pictures on the walls, the bookshelves
and the ghostly shape upon the bed, half-revealed through the sheet which
had been laid over it.

Softly, I drew back the sheet, and the vague shape became a man; or
rather, as it seemed, a waxen effigy, with something in its aspect at
once strange and familiar. The features were those of Harold Monkhouse,
but yet the face was not quite the face that I had known. So it has
always seemed to me with the dead. They have their own distinctive
character which belongs to no living man--the physiognomy of death;
impassive, expressionless, immovable; fixed for ever, or at least, until
the changes of the tomb shall obliterate even its semblance of humanity.

I stepped back a pace and looked thoughtfully at the dead man who had
slipped so quietly out of the land of the living. There he lay, stretched
out in an easy, restful posture, just as I had often seen him; the eyes
half-closed and one long, thin arm lying on the counterpane, the waxen
hand lightly grasping the open volume; looking--save for the stony
immobility--as he might if he had fallen asleep over his book. It was not
surprising that the housemaid had been deceived, for the surroundings all
tended to support the illusion. The bedside table with its pathetic
little provisions for a sick man's needs: the hooded candle-lamp, drawn
to the table-edge and turned to light the book; the little decanter of
brandy, the unused tumbler, the water-bottle, the watch, still ticking in
its upright case, the candle-box, two or three spare volumes and the
hand-bell for night use; all spoke of illness and repose with never a
hint of death.

There was nothing by which I could judge when he had died. I touched his
arm and found it rigid as an iron bar. So Mabel had found it some hours
earlier, whence I inferred that death had occurred not much past
midnight. But the doctors would be able to form a better opinion, if it
should seem necessary to form any opinion at all. More to the point than
the exact time of death was the exact cause. I recalled the blunt
question that Amos had put to Dr Dimsdale and the almost indignant tone
in which the latter had put it aside. That was less than a week ago; and
now that question had to be answered in unequivocal terms. I found myself
wondering what the politic and plausible Dimsdale would put on the death
certificate and whether he would seek Sir Robert Detling's collaboration
in the execution of that document.

I was about to replace the sheet when my ear caught the footsteps of some
one approaching on tip-toe along the corridor. The next moment the door
opened softly and Amos stole into the room. He passed me with a silent
greeting and drew near the bed, beside which he halted with his hand laid
on the dead hand and his eyes fixed gloomily on the yellowish-white,
impassive face. He spoke no word, nor did I presume to disturb this
solemn meeting and farewell, but silently slipped out into die corridor
where I waited for him to come out.

Two or three minutes passed, during which I heard him, once or twice,
moving softly about the room and judged that he was examining the
surroundings amidst which his brother had passed the last few weeks of
his life. Presently he came out, closing the door noiselessly behind him,
and joined me opposite the window. I looked a little nervously into the
stern, grief-stricken face, and as he did not speak, I said, lamely
enough: "This is a grievous and terrible thing, Mr Monkhouse."

He shook his head gravely. "Grievous indeed; and the more so if one
suspects, as I do, that it need not have happened. However, he is gone
and recriminations will not bring him back."

"No," I agreed, profoundly relieved and a little surprised at his tone;
"whatever we may feel or think, reproaches and bitter words will bring no
remedy. Have you seen Barbara?"

"No; and I think I won't--this morning. In a day or two, I hope I shall
be able to meet and speak to her as a Christian man should. Today I am
not sure of myself. You will let me know what arrangements are made about
the funeral?"

I promised that I would, and walked with him to the head of the stairs,
and when I had watched him descend and heard the street door close, I
went back to Barbara's little sitting-room.

I found her alone, and, when I entered she was standing before a
miniature that hung on the wall. She looked round as I entered and I saw
that she still looked rather dazed and strange. Her eyes were red, as if
she had been weeping, but they were now tearless, and she seemed calmer
than when I had first seen her. I went to her side, and for a few moments
we stood silently regarding the smiling, girlish face that looked out at
us from the miniature. It was that of Barbara's step-sister, a very
sweet, loveable girl, little more than a child, who had died some four
years previously, and who, I had sometimes thought, was the only human
creature for whom Barbara had felt a really deep affection. The miniature
had been painted from a photograph after her death and a narrow plait of
her gorgeous, red-gold hair had been carried round inside the frame.

"Poor little Stella!" Barbara murmured, "I have been asking myself if I
neglected her, too. I often left her for days at a time."

"You mustn't be morbid, Barbara," I said. "The poor child was very well
looked after and as happy as she could be made. And nobody could have
done any more for her. Rapid consumption is beyond the resources of
medical science at present."

"Yes, unfortunately." She was silent for a while. Then she said: "I
wonder if anything could have been done for Harold. Do you think it
possible that he might have been saved?"

"I know of no reason for thinking so, and now that he is gone I see no
use in raising the question."

She drew closer to me and slipped her hand into mine.

"You will be with us as much as you can, Rupert, won't you? We always
look to you in trouble or difficulty, and you have never failed us. Even
now you don't condemn me, whatever you may think."

"No, I blame myself for not being more alert, though it was really
Dimsdale who misled us all. Has Madeline gone to the school?"

"Yes. She had to give a lecture or demonstration, but I hope she will
manage to get a day or two off duty. I don't want to be left alone with
poor Tony. It sounds unkind to say so, for no one could be more devoted
to me than he is. But he is so terribly high-strung. Just now, he is in
an almost hysterical state. I suppose you haven't seen him this morning?"

"No. I came straight up to you." I had, in fact, kept out of his way,
for, to speak the truth, I did not much care for Anthony Wallingford. He
was of a type that I dislike rather intensely; nervous, high-strung,
emotional and in an incessant state of purposeless bustle. I did not like
his appearance, his manners or his dress. I resented the abject fawning
way in which he followed Barbara about, and I disapproved of his position
in this house; which was nominally that of secretary to Barbara's
husband, but actually that of tame cat and generally useless hanger-on. I
think I was on the point of making some disparaging comments on him, but
at that moment there came a gentle tap at the door and the subject of my
thoughts entered.

I was rather sorry that Barbara was still holding my hand. Of course, the
circumstances were very exceptional, but I have an Englishman's dislike
of emotional demonstrations in the presence of third parties.
Nevertheless, Wallingford's behaviour filled me with amazed resentment.
He stopped short with a face black as thunder, and, after a brief,
insolent stare, muttered that he was afraid he was "intruding" and
walked out of the room, closing the door sharply after him.

Barbara flushed (and I daresay I did, too), but made no outward sign of
annoyance. "You see what I mean," she said. "The poor fellow is quite
unstrung. He is an added anxiety instead of a help."

"I see that plainly enough," I replied, "but I don't see why he is
unstrung, or why an unstrung man should behave like an ill-mannered
child. At any rate, he will have to pull himself together. There is a
good deal to be done and he will have to do some of it. I may assume, I
suppose, that it will be his duty to carry out the instructions of the
executors?"

"I suppose so. But you know more about such things than I do."

"Then I had better go down and explain the position to him and set him to
work. Presently I must call on Mr Brodribb, the other executor, and let
him know what has happened. But meanwhile there are certain things which
have to be done at once. You understand?"

"Yes, indeed. You mean arrangements for the funeral. How horrible it
sounds. I can't realize it yet. It is all so shocking and so sudden and
unlooked-for. It seems like some dreadful dream."

"Well, Barbara," I said gently, "you shan't, be troubled more than is
unavoidable. I will see to all the domestic affairs and leave the legal
business to Brodribb. But I shall want Wallingford's help, and I think I
had better go down and see him now."

"Very well, Rupert," she replied with a sigh. "I shall lean on you now as
I always have done in times of trouble and difficulty, and you must try
to imagine how grateful I am since I can find no words to tell you."

She pressed my hand and released me, and I took my way down to the
library with a strong distaste for my mission.

That distaste was not lessened when I opened the door and was met by a
reek of cigarette smoke. Wallingford was sitting huddled up in an easy
chair, but as I entered, he sprang to his feet and stood facing me with a
sort of hostile apprehensiveness. The man was certainly unstrung; in fact
he was on wires. His pale, haggard face twitched, his hands trembled
visibly and his limbs were in constant, fidgety movement. But, to me,
there seemed to be no mystery about his condition. The deep yellow stains
on his fingers, the reek in the air and a pile of cigarette-ends in an
ash-bowl were enough to account for a good deal of nervous derangement,
even if there were nothing more--no drugs or drink.

I opened the business quietly, explaining what had to be done and what
help I should require from him. At first he showed a tendency to dispute
my authority and treat me as an outsider, but I soon made the position
and powers of an executor clear to him. When I had brought him to heel I
gave him a set of written instructions the following-out of which would
keep him fairly busy for the rest of the day; and having set the dismal
preparations going, I went forth from the house of mourning and took my
way to New Square, Lincoln's Inn, where were the offices of Mr Brodribb,
the family solicitor and my co-executor.



CHAPTER THREE

A SHOCK FOR THE MOURNERS

It was on the day of the funeral that the faint, unheeded mutterings of
the approaching storm began to swell into audible and threatening
rumblings, though, even then, the ominous signs failed to deliver their
full significance.

How well do I recall the scene in the darkened dining room where we sat
in our sable raiment, "ready to wenden on our pilgrimage" to the place of
everlasting rest and eternal farewell. There were but four of us, for
Amos Monkhouse had not yet arrived, though it was within a few minutes of
the appointed time to start; quite a small party; for the deceased had
but few relatives, and no outsiders had been bidden.

We were all rather silent. Intimate as we were, there was no need to make
conversation. Each, no doubt, was busy with his or her own thoughts, and
as I recall my own they seem to have been rather trivial and not very
suitable to the occasion. Now and again I stole a look at Barbara and
thought what a fine, handsome woman she was, and dimly wondered why, in
all the years that I had known her, I had never fallen in love with her.
Yet so it was. I had always admired her; we had been intimate friends,
with a certain amount of quiet affection, but nothing more--at any rate
on my part. Other I was not so sure. There had been a time, some years
before, when I had had an uneasy feeling that she looked to me for
something more than friendship. But she was always a reticent girl; very
self-reliant and self-contained. I never knew a woman better able to keep
her own counsel or control her emotions.

She was now quite herself again, quiet, dignified, rather reserved and
even a little inscrutable. Seated between Wallingford and Madeline, she
seemed unconscious of either and quite undisturbed by the secretary's
incessant nervous fidgeting and by his ill-concealed efforts to bring
himself to her notice.

From Barbara my glance turned to the woman who sat by her side noting
with dull interest the contrast between the two; a contrast as marked in
their bearing as in their appearance. For whereas Barbara was a rather
big woman, dark in colouring, quiet and resolute in manner, Madeline
Norris was somewhat small and slight, almost delicately fair, rather shy
and retiring, but yet with a suggestion of mental alertness under the
diffident manner. If Barbara gave an impression of quiet strength,
Madeline's pretty, refined face was rather expressive of subtle
intelligence But what chiefly impressed me at this moment was the curious
inversion of their attitudes towards the existing circumstances; for
whereas Barbara, the person mainly affected, maintained a quiet,
untroubled demeanour, Madeline appeared to be overcome by the sudden
catastrophe. Looking at her set, white face and the dismay in her wide,
grey eyes, and comparing her with the woman at her side, a stranger would
at once have assumed the bereavement to be hers.

My observations were interrupted by Wallingford once more dragging out
his watch.

"What on earth can have happened to Mr Amos?" he exclaimed "We are due to
start in three minutes. If he isn't here by then we shall have to start
without him. It is perfectly scandalous! Positively indecent! But there,
it's just like a parson."

"My experience of parsons," said I, "is that they are, as a rule,
scrupulously punctual. But certainly, Mr Amos is unpardonably late. It
will be very awkward if he doesn't arrive in time. Ah, there he is," I
added as the bell rang and a muffled knock at the street door was heard.

At the sound, Wallingford sprang up as if the bell had actuated a hidden
spring in the chair, and darted over to the window, from which he peered
out through the chink beside the blind.

"It isn't Amos," he reported. "It's a stranger, and a fool at that, I
should say, if he can't see that all the blinds are down."

We all listened intently. We heard the housemaid's hurried footsteps,
though she ran on tip-toe; the door opened softly, and then, after an
interval, we heard some one ushered along the hall to the drawing room. A
few moments later, Mabel entered with an obviously scandalized air.

"A gentleman wishes to speak to you, Ma'am," she announced.

"But, Mabel," said Barbara, "did you tell him what is happening in this
house?"

"Yes, Ma'am, I explained exactly how things were and told him that he
must call tomorrow. But he said that his business was urgent and that he
must see you at once."

"Very well," said Barbara. "I will go and see what he wants. But it is
very extraordinary."

She rose, and nearly colliding with Wallingford, who had rushed to open
the door--which was, in fact, wide open--walked out quickly, closing the
door after her. After a short interval--during which Wallingford paced
the room excitedly, peered out of the window, sat down, got up again and
looked at his watch--she came back, and, standing in the doorway, looked
at me.

"Would you come here for a minute, Rupert," she said, quietly.

I rose at once and walked back with her to the drawing room, on entering
which I became aware of a large man, standing monumentally on the
hearth-rug and inspecting the interior of his hat. He looked to me like a
plainclothes policeman, and my surmise was verified by a printed card
which he presented and which bore the inscription "Sergeant J Burton."

"I am acting as coroner's officer," he explained in reply to my
interrogatory glance, "and I have come to notify you that the funeral
will have to be postponed as the coroner has decided to hold an inquest;
I have seen the undertakers and explained matters to them."

"Do you know what reason there is for an inquest?" I asked. "The cause of
death was certified in the regular way."

"I know nothing beyond my instructions, which were to notify Mrs
Monkhouse that the funeral is put off and to serve the summonses for the
witnesses. I may as well do that now."

With this he laid on the table six small blue papers, which I saw were
addressed respectively to Barbara, Madeline, Wallingford, the housemaid,
the cook and myself.

"Have you no idea at all why an inquest is to be held?" I asked as I
gathered up the papers.

"I have no information," he replied, cautiously, "but I expect there is
some doubt about the exact cause of death. The certificate may not be
quite clear or it may be that some interested party has communicated with
the coroner. That is what usually happens, you know, Sir. But at any
rate," he added, cheerfully, "you will know all about it the day after
tomorrow, which, you will observe, is the day fixed for the inquest."

"And what have we to do meanwhile?" Barbara asked. "The inquest will not
be held in this house, I presume."

"Certainly not, Madam," the sergeant replied. "A hearse will be sent
round tonight to remove the body to the mortuary, where the post mortem
examination will be carried out, and the inquest will be held in the
parish hall, as is stated on the summons. I am sorry that you should be
put to this inconvenience," he concluded, moving tentatively towards the
door, "but--er--it couldn't be helped, I suppose. Good morning, Madam."

I walked with him to the door and let him out, while Barbara waited for
me in the hall, not unobserved by Wallingford, whose eye appeared in a
chink beside the slightly open dining room door. I pointedly led her back
into the drawing room and closed the door audibly behind us. She turned a
pale and rather shocked face to me but she spoke quite composedly as she
asked: "What do you make of it, Rupert? Is it Amos?"

I had already reluctantly decided that it must be. I say, reluctantly,
because, if this were really his doing, the resigned tone of his last
words to me would appear no less than sheer, gross hypocrisy.

"I don't know who else it could be," I answered. "The fact that he did
not come this morning suggests that he at least knew what was happening.
If he did, I think he might have warned us."

"Yes, indeed. It will be a horrid scandal; most unpleasant for us all,
and especially for me. Not that I am entitled to any sympathy. Poor
Harold! How he would have hated the thought of a public fuss over his
body. I suppose we must go in now and tell the others. Do you mind
telling them, Rupert?"

We crossed the hall to the dining room where we found the two waiting
impatiently, Madeline very pale and agitated while Wallingford was pacing
the room like a wild beast. Both looked at us with eager interrogation as
we entered, and I made the announcement bluntly and in a dozen words.

The effect on both was electrical. Madeline, with a little cry of horror,
sank, white-faced and trembling, into a chair. As for Wallingford, his
behaviour was positively maniacal. After staring at me for a few moments
with starting eyes and mouth agape, he flung up his arms and uttered a
hoarse shout.

"This," he yelled, "is the doing of that accursed parson! Now we know why
he kept out of the way--and it is well for him that he did!"

He clenched his fists and glared around him, showing his tobacco-stained
teeth in a furious snarl while the sweat gathered in beads on his livid
face. Then, suddenly, his mood changed and he dropped heavily on a chair,
burying his face in his shaking hands. Barbara admonished him, quietly.

"Do try to be calm, Tony. There is nothing to get so excited about. It is
all very unpleasant and humiliating, of course, but at any rate you are
not affected. It is I who will be called to account."

"And do you suppose that doesn't affect me?" demanded Wallingford, now
almost on the verge of tears.

"I am sure it does, Tony," she replied, gently, "but if you want to be
helpful to me you will try to be calm and reasonable. Come, now," she
added, persuasively, "let us put it away for the present. I must tell the
servants. Then we had better have lunch and go our several ways to think
the matter over quietly each of us alone. We shall only agitate one
another if we remain together."

I agreed emphatically with this sensible suggestion. "Not," I added,
"that there is much for us to think over. The explanations will have to
come from Dimsdale. It was he who failed to grasp the seriousness of poor
Harold's condition."

While Barbara was absent, breaking the news to the servants, I tried to
bring Madeline to a more composed frame of mind. With Wallingford I had
no patience. Men should leave hysterics to the other sex. But I was sorry
for Madeline; and even if she seemed more overwhelmed by the sudden
complications than the occasion justified, I told myself that the blow
had fallen when she was already shaken by Harold's unexpected death.

The luncheon was a silent and comfortless function; indeed it was little
more than an empty form. But it had the merit of brevity. When the last
dish had been sent away almost intact. Wallingford drew out his cigarette
case and we all rose.

"What are you going to do, Madeline?" Barbara asked.

"I must go to the school, I suppose, and let the secretary know
that--that I may have to be absent for a day or two. It will be horrid. I
shall have to tell him all about it--after having got leave for the
funeral. But it will sound so strange, so extraordinary. Oh! It is
horrible!"

"It is!" exclaimed Wallingford, fumbling with tremulous fingers at his
cigarette case. "It is diabolical! A fiendish plot to disgrace and
humiliate us. As to that infernal parson, I should like--"

"Never mind that. Tony," said Barbara; "and we had better not stay here,
working up one another's emotions. What are you doing, Rupert?"

"I shall go to my chambers and clear off some correspondence."

"Then you might walk part of the way with Madeline and see if you can't
make her mind a little more easy."

Madeline looked at me eagerly. "Will you, Rupert?" she asked.

Of course I assented, and a few minutes later we set forth together.

For a while she walked by my side in silence with an air of deep
reflection, and I refrained from interrupting her thoughts, having no
very clear idea as to what I should say to her. Moreover, my own mind was
pretty busily occupied. Presently she spoke, in a tentative way, as if
opening a discussion.

"I am afraid you must think me very weak and silly to be so much upset by
this new trouble."

"Indeed, I don't," I replied. "It is a most disturbing and humiliating
affair and it will be intensely unpleasant for us all, but especially for
Barbara--to say nothing of Dimsdale."

"Dr Dimsdale is not our concern," said she, "but it will be perfectly
horrible for Barbara. For she really has been rather casual, poor girl,
and they are sure to make things unpleasant for her. It will be a most
horrid scandal. Don't you think so?"

To be candid, I did. Indeed, I had just been picturing to myself the
possibilities with an officious coroner--and he would not need to be so
very officious, either--and one or two cross-grained jurymen. Barbara
might be subjected to a very unpleasant examination. But I did not think
it necessary to say this to Madeline. Sufficient for the day is the evil
thereof. I contented myself with a vague agreement.

There was another interval of silence. Then, a little to my surprise, she
drew closer to me, and, slipping her hand under my arm, said very
earnestly: "Rupert, I want you to tell me what you really think. What is
it all about?"

I looked down, rather disconcerted, into the face that was turned up to
me so appealingly; and suddenly--and rather irrelevantly--it was borne in
on me that it was a singularly sweet and charming face. I had never quite
realized it before. But then she had never before looked at me quite in
this way; with this trustful, coaxing, appealing expression.

"I don't quite understand you, Madeline," I said, evasively. "I know no
more about it than you do."

"Oh, but you do, Rupert. You are a lawyer and you have had a lot of
experience. You must have formed some opinion as to why they have decided
to hold an inquest. Do tell me what you think."

The coaxing, almost wheedling tone, and the entreaty in her eyes, looking
so earnestly into mine, nearly conquered my reserve. But not quite. Once
more I temporized.

"Well, Madeline, we all realize that what Dimsdale has written on the
certificate is little more than a guess, and quite possibly wrong; and
even Detling couldn't get much farther."

"Yes, I realize that. But I didn't think that inquests were held just to
find out whether the doctors' opinions were correct or not."

Of course she was perfectly right; and I now perceived that her thoughts
had been travelling along the same lines as my own. An inquest would not
be held merely to clear up an obscure diagnosis. There was certainly
something more behind this affair than Dimsdale's failure to recognize
the exact nature of the illness. There was only one simple explanation of
the coroner's action, and I gave it--with a strong suspicion that it was
not the right one.

"They are not, as a rule, excepting in hospitals. But this is a special
case. Amos Monkhouse was obviously dissatisfied with Dimsdale, and with
Barbara, too. He may have challenged the death certificate and asked for
an inquest. The coroner would be hardly likely to refuse, especially if
there were a hint of negligence or malpractice."

"Did Mr Amos say anything to you that makes you think he may have
challenged the certificate?"

"He said very little to me at all," I replied, rather casuistically and
suppressing the fact that Amos had explicitly accepted the actual
circumstances and deprecated any kind of recrimination.

"I can hardly believe that he would have done it," said Madeline, "just
to punish Barbara and Dr Dimsdale. It would be so vindictive, especially
for a clergyman."

"Clergymen are very human sometimes," I rejoined; and, as, rather to my
relief, we now came in sight of Madeline's destination, I adverted to the
interview which she seemed to dread so much. "There is no occasion for
you to go into details with the secretary," I said. "In fact you can't.
The exact cause of death was not clear to the doctors and it has been
considered advisable to hold an inquest. That is all you know, and it is
enough. You are summoned as a witness and you are legally bound to
attend, so you are asking no favour. Cut the interview dead short, and
when you have done with it, try, like a sensible girl, to forget the
inquest for the present. I shall come over tomorrow and then we can
reconstitute the history of the case, so that we may go into the
witness-box, or its equivalent, with a clear idea of what we have to
tell. And now, good-bye, or rather au revoir!"

"Good-bye, Rupert." She took my proffered hand and held it as she thanked
me for walking with her. "Do you know, Rupert," she added, "there is
something strangely comforting and reassuring about you. We all feel it.
You seem to carry an atmosphere of quiet strength and security. I don't
wonder that Barbara is so fond of you. Not," she concluded, "that she
holds a monopoly."

With this she let go my hand, and, with a slightly shy smile and the
faintest suspicion of a blush, turned away and walked quickly and with an
air quite cheerful and composed towards the gateway of the institution.
Apparently, my society had had a beneficial effect on her nervous
condition.

I watched her until she disappeared into the entry, and then resumed my
journey eastward, rather relieved, I fear, at having disposed of my
companion. For I wanted to think--of her among other matters; and it was
she who first occupied my cogitations. The change from her usual
matter-of-fact friendliness had rather taken me by surprise; and I had to
admit that it was not a disagreeable surprise. But what was the
explanation? Was this intimate, clinging manner merely a passing phase
due to an emotional upset, or was it that the special circumstances had
allowed feelings hitherto concealed to come to the surface? It was an
interesting question, but one that time alone could answer; and as there
were other questions, equally interesting and more urgent, I consigned
this one to the future and turned to consider the others.

What could be the meaning of this inquest? The supposition that Amos had
suddenly turned vindictive and resolved to expose the neglect, to which
he probably attributed his brother's death, I could not entertain,
especially after what he had said to me. It would have written him down
the rankest of hypocrites. And yet he was in some way connected with the
affair as was proved by his failure to appear at the funeral. As to the
idea that the inquiry was merely to elucidate the nature of the illness,
that was quite untenable. A private autopsy would have been the proper
procedure for that purpose.

I was still turning the question over in my mind when, as I passed the
Griffin at Temple Bar, I became aware of a tall figure some distance
ahead walking in the same direction. The build of the man and his long,
swinging stride seemed familiar. I looked at him more attentively; and
just as he turned to enter Devereux Court I recognized him definitely as
a fellow Templar named Thorndyke.

The chance encounter seemed a singularly fortunate one, and at once I
quickened my pace to overtake him. For Dr Thorndyke was a medical
barrister and admittedly the greatest living authority on medical
jurisprudence. The whole subject of inquests and Coroners' Law was an
open book to him. But he was not only a lawyer. He had, I understood, a
professional and very thorough knowledge of pathology and of the science
of medicine in general, so that he was the very man to enlighten me in my
present difficulties.

I overtook him at the Little Gate of the Middle Temple and we walked
through together into New Court. I wasted no time, but, after the
preliminary greetings, asked him if he had a few minutes to spare. He
replied, in his quiet, genial way: "But, of course, Mayfield. I always
have a few minutes to spare for a friend and a colleague."

I thanked him for the gracious reply, and, as we slowly descended the
steps and sauntered across Fountain Court, I opened the matter without
preamble and gave him a condensed summary of the case; to which lie
listened with close attention and evidently with keen interest.

"I am afraid," he said, "that your family doctor will cut rather a poor
figure. He seems to have mismanaged the case rather badly, to judge by
the fact that the death of the patient took him quite by surprise. By the
way, can you give me any idea of the symptoms--as observed by yourself, I
mean?"

"I have told you what was on the certificate."

"Yes. But the certified cause of death appears to be contested. You saw
the patient pretty often, I understand. Now what sort of appearance did
he present to you?"

The question rather surprised me. Dimsdale's opinion might not be worth
much, but the casual and inexpert observations of a layman would have
seemed to me to be worth nothing at all. However, I tried to recall such
details as I could remember of poor Monkhouse's appearance and his own
comments on his condition and recounted them to Thorndyke with such
amplifications as his questions elicited. "But," I concluded, "the real
question is, who has set the coroner in motion and with what object?"

"That question," said Thorndyke, "will be answered the day after
tomorrow, and there is not much utility in trying to guess at the answer
in advance. The real question is whether any arrangements ought to be
made in the interests of your friends. We are quite in the dark as to
what may occur in the course of the inquest."

"Yes, I had thought of that. Some one ought to be present to represent
Mrs Monkhouse. I suppose it would not be possible for you to attend to
watch the case on her behalf?"

"I don't think it would be advisable," he replied. "You will be present
and could claim to represent Mrs Monkhouse so far as might be necessary
to prevent improper questions being put to her. But I do think that you
should have a complete record of all that takes place. I would suggest
that I send Holman, who does most of my shorthand reporting, with
instructions to make a verbatim report of the entire proceedings. It may
turn out to be quite unnecessary; but if any complications should arise,
we shall have the complete depositions with the added advantage that you
will have been present and will have heard all the evidence. How will
that suit you?"

"If you think it is the best plan there is nothing more to say, excepting
to thank you for your help."

"And give me a written note of the time and place to hand to Holman when
I give him his instructions."

I complied with this request at once; and having by this time reached the
end of the Terrace, I shook hands with him and walked slowly to my
chambers in Fig Tree Court. I had not got much out of Thorndyke excepting
a very useful suggestion and some valuable help; indeed, as I turned over
his extremely cautious utterances and speculated on what he meant by
"complications." I found myself rather more uncomfortably puzzled than I
had been before I met him.



CHAPTER FOUR

"HOW, WHEN AND WHERE--"

It was on the second day after the interrupted funeral that the
thunderbolt fell. I cannot say that it found me entirely unprepared, for
my reflections during the intervening day had filled me with forebodings;
and by Thorndyke that catastrophe was pretty plainly foreseen. But on the
others the blow fell with devastating effect. However, I must not
anticipate. Rather let me get back to a consecutive narration of the
actual events.

On the day after the visit of the coroner's officer we had held, at my
suggestion, a sort of family committee to consider what we knew of the
circumstances and antecedents of Harold's death, so that we might be in a
position to give our evidence clearly and readily and be in agreement as
to the leading facts. Thus we went to the coroners court prepared, at
least, to tell an intelligible and consistent story.

As soon as I entered the large room in which the inquest was to be held,
my forebodings deepened. The row of expectant reporters was such as one
does not find where the proceedings are to be no more than a simple,
routine inquiry. Something of public interest was anticipated, and these
gentlemen of the Press had received a hint from some well-informed
quarter. I ran my eye along the row and was somewhat relieved to observe
Mr Holman, Thorndyke's private reporter, seated at the table with a large
note-book and a half-dozen well-sharpened pencils before him. His
presence--as, in a sense, Thorndyke's deputy--gave me the reassuring
feeling that, if there were to be "complications," I should not have to
meet them with my own limited knowledge and experience, but that there
were reserves of special knowledge and weighty counsel on which I could
fall back.

The coroner's manner seemed to me ominous. His introductory address to
the jury was curt and ambiguous, setting forth no more than the name of
the deceased and the fact that circumstances had seemed to render an
inquiry advisable; and having said this, he proceeded forthwith (the jury
having already viewed the body) to call the first witness, the Reverend
Amos Monkhouse.

I need not repeat the clergyman's evidence in detail. When he had
identified the body as that of his brother, Harold, he went on to relate
the events which I have recorded: his visit to his sick brother, his
alarm at the patient's appearance, his call upon Dr Dimsdale and his
subsequent interview with Sir Robert Detling. It was all told in a very
concise, matter-of-fact manner, and I noted that the coroner did not seek
to amplify the condensed statement by any questions.

"At about nine o'clock in the morning of the 13th," the witness
continued, "I received a telegram from Miss Norris informing me that my
brother had died in the night. I went out at once and sent a telegram to
Sir Robert Detling informing him of what had happened. I then went to
number 16 Hilborough Square, where I saw the body of deceased lying in
his bed quite cold and stiff. I saw nobody at the house excepting the
housemaid and Mr Mayfield. After leaving the house I walked about the
streets for several hours and did not return to my hotel until late in
the afternoon. When I arrived there, I found awaiting me a telegram from
Sir Robert Detling asking me to call on him without delay. I set forth at
once and arrived at Sir Roberts house at half-past five, and was shown
into his study immediately. Sir Robert then told me that he had come to
the conclusion that the circumstances of my brother's death called for
some investigation and that he proposed to communicate with the coroner.
He urged me not to raise any objections and advised me to say nothing to
anyone but to wait until the coroner's decision was made known. I asked
him for his reasons for communicating with the coroner, but he said that
he would rather not make any statement. I heard no more until the morning
of the fifteenth, the day appointed for the funeral, when the coroner's
officer called at my hotel to inform me that the funeral would not take
place and to serve the summons for my attendance here as a witness."

When Amos had concluded his statement, the coroner glanced at the Jury,
and as no one offered to put any questions, he dismissed the witness and
called the next--Mabel Withers--who, at once, came forward to the table.
Having been sworn and having given her name, the witness deposed that she
had been housemaid to deceased and that it was she who had discovered the
fact of his death, relating the circumstances in much the same words as I
have recorded. When she had finished her narrative, the coroner said:
"You have told us that the candle in the deceased's lamp was completely
burnt out. Do you happen to know how long one of those candles would
burn?"

"Yes. About four hours."

"When did you last see deceased alive?"

"At half-past ten on Tuesday night, the twelfth. I looked in at his room
on my way up to bed to see if he wanted anything, and I gave him a dose
of medicine."

"What was his condition then?"

"He looked very ill, but he seemed fairly comfortable. He had a book in
his hand but was not reading."

"Was the candle alight then?"

"No, the gas was alight. I asked him if I should turn it out but he said
'no.' He would wait until Miss Norris or Mr Wallingford came."

"Did you notice how much candle there was in the lamp then?"

"There was a whole candle. I put it in myself in the afternoon and it had
not been lit. He used to read by the gas as long as it was alight. He
only used the candle-lamp if he couldn't sleep and the gas was out."

"Could you form any opinion as to how long the candle had been burnt
out?"

"It must have been out some time, for there was no smell in the room as
there would have been if it had only been out a short time. The window
was hardly open at all; only just a small crack."

"Do you know when deceased last took food?"

"Yes, he had his supper at eight o'clock; an omelette and a tiny piece of
toast with a glass of milk."

"Who cooked the omelette?"

"Miss Norris."

"Why did Miss Norris cook it? Was the cook out?"

"No. But Miss Norris usually cooked his supper and sometimes made little
dishes for his lunch. She is a very expert cook."

"Who took the omelette up to deceased?"

"Miss Norris. I asked if I should take his supper up, but she said she
was going up and would take it herself."

"Was anyone else present when Miss Norris was cooking the omelette?"

"Yes, I was present and so was the cook."

"Did deceased usually have the same food as the rest of the household?"

"No, he usually had his own special diet."

"Who prepared his food, as a rule?"

"Sometimes the cook, but more often Miss Norris."

"Now, with regard to his medicine. Did deceased usually take it himself?"

"No, he didn't like to have the bottle on the bedside table, as it was
rather crowded with his books and things. The bottle and the
medicine-glass were kept on the mantelpiece and the medicine was given to
him by whoever happened to be in the room when a dose was due. Sometimes
I gave it to him; at other times Mrs Monkhouse or Miss Norris or Mr
Wallingford."

"Do you remember when the last bottle of medicine came?"

"Yes. It came early in the afternoon of the day before he died. I took it
in and carried it up at once."

When he had written down this answer, the coroner ran his eye through his
previous notes and then glanced at the jury.

"Do any of you gentlemen wish to ask the witness any questions?" he
enquired; and as no one answered, he dismissed the witness with the
request that she would stay in the court in case any further testimony
should be required of her. He then announced that he would take the
evidence of Sir Robert Detling next in order to release him for his
probably numerous engagements. Sir Robert's name was accordingly called
and a grave-looking, elderly gentleman rose from near the doorway and
walked up to the table. When the new witness had been sworn and the
formal preliminaries disposed of, the coroner said: "I will ask you. Sir
Robert, to give the jury an account of the circumstances which led to
your making a certain communication to me."

Sir Robert bowed gravely and proceeded at once to make his statement in
the clear, precise manner of a practised speaker.

"On Friday, the 8th instant, the Reverend Amos Monkhouse called on me to
arrange a consultation with Dr Dimsdale who was in attendance on his
brother, the deceased. I met Dr Dimsdale by appointment the following
afternoon, the 9th, and with him made a careful examination of deceased.
I was extremely puzzled by the patient's condition. He was obviously very
seriously--I thought, dangerously--ill, but I was unable to discover any
signs or symptoms that satisfactorily accounted for his grave general
condition. I could not give his disease a name. Eventually, I took a
number of blood-films and some specimens of the secretions to submit to a
pathologist for examination and to have them tested for micro-organisms.
I took them that night to Professor Garnett's laboratory, but the
professor was unfortunately absent and not returning until the following
night--Sunday. I therefore kept them until Sunday night when I took them
to him and asked him to examine them with as little delay as possible. He
reported on the following day that microscopical examination had not
brought to light anything abnormal, but he was making cultures from the
secretions and would report the result on Wednesday morning. On Wednesday
morning at about half-past nine, I received a telegram from the Reverend
Amos Monkhouse informing me that his brother had died during the night. A
few minutes later, a messenger brought Professor Garnett's report; which
was to the effect that no disease-bearing organisms had been found, nor
any thing abnormal excepting a rather singular scarcity of
micro-organisms of any kind.

"This fact, together with the death of the patient, suddenly aroused my
suspicions. For the absence of the ordinary micro-organisms suggested the
presence of some foreign chemical substance. And now, as I recalled the
patient's symptoms, I found them consistent with the presence in the body
of some foreign substance. Instantly, I made my way to Professor
Garnett's laboratory and communicated my suspicions to him. I found that
he shared them and had carefully preserved the remainder of the material
for further examination. We both suspected the presence of a foreign
substance, and we both suspected it to be arsenic.

"The professor had at hand the means of making a chemical test, so we
proceeded at once to use them. The test that we employed was the one
known as Reinsch's test. The result showed a very appreciable amount of
arsenic in the secretions tested. On this, I sealed up what was left of
the specimens, and, after notifying Mr Monkhouse of my intention,
reported the circumstances to the coroner."

When Sir Robert ceased speaking, the coroner bowed, and having written
down the last words, reflected for a few moments. Then he turned to the
jury and said: "I don't think we need detain Sir Robert any longer unless
there are any questions that you would like to ask."

At this point the usual over-intelligent juryman interposed.

"We should like to know whether the vessels in which the specimens were
contained were perfectly clean and free from chemicals."

"The bottles," Sir Robert replied, "were clean in the ordinary sense. I
rinsed them out with clean water before introducing the material. But, of
course, they could not be guaranteed to be chemically clean."

"Then doesn't that invalidate the analysis?" the juror asked.

"It was hardly an analysis," the witness replied. "It was just a
preliminary test."

"The point which you are raising, Sir," said the coroner, "is quite a
sound one but it is not relevant to this inquiry. Sir Robert's test was
made to ascertain if an inquiry was necessary. He decided that it was,
and we are now holding that inquiry. You will not form your verdict on
the results of Sir Robert's test but on those of the post mortem
examination and the special analysis that has been made."

This explanation appeared to satisfy the juror and Sir Robert was allowed
to depart. The coroner once more seemed to consider awhile and then
addressed the jury.

"I think it will be best to take next the evidence relating to the
examination of the body. When you have heard that you will be better able
to weigh the significance of what the other witnesses have to tell us. We
will now take the evidence of Dr Randall."

As the new witness, a small, dry, eminently professional-looking man,
stepped briskly up to the table, I stole a quick, rather furtive glance
at my companions and saw my own alarm plainly reflected in their faces
and bearing. Barbara, on my left hand, sat up stiffly, rigid as a statue,
her face pale and set, but quite composed, her eyes fixed on the man who
was about to be sworn. Madeline, on my right, was ghastly. But she, too,
was still and quiet, sitting with her hands tightly clasped, as if to
restrain or conceal their trembling, and her eyes bent on the floor. As
to Wallingford, who sat on the other side of Barbara, I could not see his
face, but by his foot, which I could see and hear, tapping quickly on the
floor as if he were working a spinning-wheel, and his incessantly moving
hands, I judged that his nerves were at full tension.

The new witness deposed that his name was Walter Randall, that he was a
Bachelor of Medicine and police surgeon of the district and that he had
made a careful examination of the body of deceased and that, with Dr
Barnes, he had made an analysis of certain parts of that body.

"To anticipate a little," said the coroner, "did you arrive at an opinion
as to the cause of death?"

"Yes. From the post mortem examination and the analysis taken together, I
came to the conclusion that deceased died from the effects of arsenic
poisoning."

"Have you any doubt that arsenic poisoning was really the cause of the
deceased's death?"

"No, I have no doubt whatever."

The reply, uttered with quiet decision, elicited a low murmur from the
jury and the few spectators, amidst which I heard Madeline gasp in a
choking whisper, "Oh! God!" and even Barbara was moved to a low cry of
horror. But I did not dare to look at either of them. As for me, the blow
had fallen already. Sir Robert's evidence had told me all.

"You said," the coroner resumed, "that the post mortem and the analysis,
taken together, led you to this conclusion. What did you mean by that?"

"I meant that the appearance of the internal organs, taken alone, would
not have been conclusive. The conditions that I found were suggestive of
arsenic poisoning but might possibly have been due to disease. It was
only the ascertained presence of arsenic that converted the probability
into certainty."

"You are quite sure that the conditions were not due to disease?"

"Not entirely. I would rather say that the effects of arsenical poisoning
were added to and mingled with those of old-standing disease."

"Would you tell us briefly what abnormal conditions you found?"

"The most important were those in the stomach, which showed marked signs
of inflammation."

"You are aware that the death certificate gives old-standing chronic
gastritis as one of the causes of death?"

"Yes, and I think correctly. The arsenical gastritis was engrafted on an
already existing chronic gastritis. That is what made the appearances
rather difficult to interpret, especially as the post mortem appearances
in arsenical poisoning are extraordinarily variable."

"What else did you find?"

"There were no other conditions that were directly associated with the
poison. The heart was rather fatty and dilated, and its condition
probably accounts for the sudden collapse which seems to have occurred."

"Does not collapse usually occur in poisoning by arsenic?"

"Eventually it does, but it is usually the last of a long train of
symptoms. In some cases, however, collapse occurs quite early and may
carry the victim off at once. That is what appears from the housemaid's
evidence to have happened in this case. Death seems to have been sudden
and almost peaceful."

"Were there any other signs of disease?"

"Yes, the lungs were affected. There were signs of considerable bronchial
catarrh, but I do not regard this as having any connection with the
effects of the poison. It appeared to be an old-standing condition."

"Yes," said the coroner. "The certificate mentions chronic bronchial
catarrh of several years' standing. Did you find any arsenic in the
stomach?"

"Not in the solid form and only a little more than a hundredth of a grain
altogether. The stomach was practically empty. The other organs were
practically free from disease, excepting, perhaps, the kidneys, which
were congested but not organically diseased."

"And as to the amount of arsenic present?"

"The analysis was necessarily a rather hasty one and probably shows less
than the actual quantity; but we found, as I have said, just over a
hundredth of a grain in the stomach, one and a half grains in the liver,
nearly a fifth of a grain in the kidneys and small quantities, amounting
in all to two grains, in the blood and tissues. The total amount actually
found was thus a little over three and a half grains--a lethal dose."

"What is the fatal dose of arsenic?"

"Two grains may prove fatal if taken in solution, as it appears to have
been in this case. Two and a half grains, in a couple of ounces of
fly-paper water, killed a strong, healthy girl of nineteen in thirty-six
hours."

"And how long does a poisonous dose take to produce death?"

"The shortest period recorded is twenty minutes, the longest, over three
weeks."

"Did you come to any general conclusion as to how long deceased had been
suffering from the effects of arsenic and as to die manner in which it
had been administered?"

"From the distribution of the poison in the organs and tissues and from
the appearance of the body, I inferred that the administration of arsenic
had been going on for a considerable time. There were signs of chronic
poisoning which led me to believe that for quite a long rime--perhaps
months--deceased had been taking repeated small doses of the poison, and
that the final dose took such rapid effect by reason of the enfeebled
state of the deceased at the time when it was administered."

"And as to the mode of administration? Did you ascertain that?"

"In part, I ascertained it quite definitely. When the bearers went to the
house to fetch the body, I accompanied them and took the opportunity to
examine the bedroom. There I found on the mantelpiece a bottle of
medicine with the name of deceased on the label and brought it away with
me. It was an eight ounce bottle containing when full eight doses, of
which only one had been taken. Dr Barnes and I, together, analyzed the
remaining seven ounces of the medicine and obtained from it just over
eleven grains of arsenic; that is a fraction over a grain and a half in
each ounce dose. The arsenic was in solution and had been introduced into
the medicine in the form of the solution known officially as Liquor
Arsenicalis, or Fowler's Solution."

"That is perfectly definite," said the coroner. "But you said that you
ascertained the mode of administration in part. Do you mean that you
inferred the existence of some other vehicle?"

"Yes. A single dose of this medicine contained only a grain and a half of
arsenic, which would hardly account for the effects produced or the
amount of arsenic which was found in the body. Of course, the preceding
dose from the other bottle may have contained the poison, too, or it may
have been taken in some other way."

"What other way do you suggest?"

"I can merely suggest possibilities. A meal was taken about eight
o'clock. If that meal had contained a small quantity of arsenic--even a
single grain--that, added to what was in the medicine, would have been
enough to cause death. But there is no evidence whatever that the food
did contain arsenic."

"If the previous dose of medicine had contained the same quantity of the
poison as the one that was last taken, would that account for the death
of deceased?"

"Yes. He would then have taken over three grains in four hours--more than
the minimum fatal dose."

"Did you see the other--the empty medicine bottle?"

"No. I looked for it and should have taken possession of it, but it was
not there."

"Is there anything else that you have to tell us concerning your
examination?"

"No, I think I have told you all I know about the case."

The coroner cast an interrogatory glance at the jury, and when none of
them accepted the implied invitation, he released the witness and named
Dr Barnes as his successor.

I need not record in detail the evidence of this witness. Having deposed
that he was a Doctor of Science and lecturer in Chemistry at St Martha's
Medical College, he proceeded to confirm Dr Randall's evidence as to the
analysis, giving somewhat fuller and more precise details. He had been
present at the autopsy, but he was not a pathologist and was not
competent to describe the condition of the body. He had analyzed the
contents of the medicine bottle with Dr Randall's assistance and he
confirmed the last witness's statement as to the quantity of arsenic
found and the form in which it had been introduced--Fowler's Solution.

"What is the strength of Fowlers Solution?"

"It contains four grains of arsenic--or, more strictly, of arsenious
acid--to the fluid ounce. So that, as the full bottle of medicine must
have contained just over twelve and a half grains of arsenious acid, the
quantity of Fowler's Solution introduced must have been a little over
three fluid ounces; three point fourteen, to be exact."

"You are confident that it was Fowler's Solution that was used?"

"Yes; the chemical analysis showed that; but in addition, there was the
colour and the smell. Fowler's Solution is coloured red with Red
Sandalwood and scented with Tincture of Lavender as a precaution against
accidents. Otherwise it would be colourless, odourless and tasteless,
like water."

On the conclusion of Dr Barnes' evidence, the coroner remarked to the
jury: "I think we ought to be clear on the facts with regard to this
medicine. Let Mabel Withers be recalled."

Once more the housemaid took her place by the table and the coroner
resumed the examination.

"You say that the last bottle of medicine came early in the afternoon.
Can you tell us the exact time?"

"It was about a quarter to three. I remember that because when I took up
the new bottle, I asked Mr Monkhouse if he had had his medicine and he
said that his brother, Mr Amos Monkhouse, had given him a dose at two
o'clock just before he left."

"Did you open the fresh bottle?"

"I took off the paper wrapping and the cap but I didn't take the cork
out."

"Was the old bottle empty then?"

"No; there was one dose left in it. That would be due at six o'clock."

"Do you know what became of the old bottle?"

"Yes. When I had given him his last dose--that was out of the new
bottle--I took the old bottle away and washed it at once."

"Why did you wash the bottle?"

"The used medicine bottles were always washed and sent back to Dr
Dimsdale."

"Did you send back the corks, too?"

"No, the corks were usually burned in the rubbish destructor."

"Do you know what happened to this particular cork?"

"I took it down with me in the morning and dropped it in the bin which
was kept for the rubbish to be taken out to the destructor. The cork must
have been burned with the other rubbish the same day."

"When you gave deceased that last dose of medicine from the new bottle,
did you notice anything unusual about it? Any smell, for instance?"

"I noticed a very faint smell of lavender. But that was not unusual. His
medicine often smelt of lavender."

"Do you know if the previous bottle of medicine smelt of lavender?"

"Yes, it did. I noticed it when I was washing out the bottle."

"That, gentlemen," said the coroner, as he wrote down the answer, "is a
very important fact. You will notice that it bears out Dr Randall's
opinion that more than one dose of the poison had been given; that, in
fact, a number of repeated small doses had been administered. And, so far
as we can see at present, the medicine was, at least, the principal
medium of its administration. The next problem that we have to solve is
how the poison got into the medicine. If none of you wish to put any
questions to the very intelligent witness whom we have just been
examining, I think we had better call Dr Dimsdale and hear what he has to
tell us."

The jury had no questions to put to Mabel but were manifestly all agog to
hear Dr Dimsdale's evidence. The housemaid was accordingly sent back to
her seat, and the doctor stepped briskly--almost too briskly, I
thought--up to the table.



CHAPTER FIVE

MADELINE'S ORDEAL

I was rather sorry for Dimsdale. His position was a very disagreeable one
and he fully realized it. His patient had been poisoned before his very
eyes and he had never suspected even grave illness. In a sense, the death
of Harold Monkhouse lay at his door and it was pretty certain that every
one present would hold him accountable for the disaster. Indeed, it was
likely that he would receive less than justice. Those who judged him
would hardly stop to reflect on the extraordinary difficulties that beset
a busy medical man whose patient is being secretly poisoned; would fail
to consider the immense number of cases of illness presented to him in
the course of years of practice and the infinitely remote probability
that any one of them is a case of poison. The immense majority of doctors
pass through the whole of their professional lives without meeting with
such a case; and it is not surprising that when the infinitely rare
contingency arises, it nearly always takes the practitioner unawares. My
own amazement at this incredible horror tended to make me sympathetic
towards Dimsdale and it was with some relief that I noted the courteous
and considerate manner that the coroner adopted in dealing with the new
witness.

"I think," the former observed, "that we had better, in the first place,
pursue our inquiries concerning the medicine. You have heard the evidence
of Dr Randall and Dr Barnes. This bottle of medicine, before any was
taken from it, contained twelve and a half grains of arsenious acid, in
the form of just over three fluid ounces of Fowler's Solution. Can you
suggest any explanation of that fact?"

"No," replied Dimsdale, "I cannot."

"What should the bottle have contained? What was the composition of the
medicine?"

"The medicine was just a simple, very mild tonic and alternative. The
bottle contained twenty-four minims of Tincture of Nux Vomica, sixteen
minims of Liquor Arsenicalis, half a fluid ounce of Syrup of Bitter
Orange to cover the taste of the Nux Vomica and half an ounce of Compound
Tincture of Cardamoms. So that each dose contained three minims of
Tincture of Nux Vomica and two minims of Liquor Arsenicalis."

"Liquor Arsenicalis is another name for Fowler's Solution, I understand?"

"Yes, it is the official name; the other is the popular name."

"Who supplied this medicine?"

"It was supplied by me."

"Do you usually supply your patients with medicine?"

"No. Only a few of my old patients who prefer to have their medicine from
me. Usually, I write prescriptions which my patients have made up by
chemists."

"This bottle, then, was made up in your own dispensary?"

"Yes."

"Now, I put it to you, Dr Dimsdale: this medicine did actually contain
Fowler's Solution, according to the prescription. Is it not possible that
some mistake may have occurred in the amount put into the bottle?"

"No, it is quite impossible."

"Why is it impossible?"

"Because I made up this particular bottle myself. As my dispenser is not
a qualified pharmacist, I always dispense, with my own hands, any
medicines containing poisons. All dangerous drugs are kept in a poison
cupboard under lock and key, and I carry the key on my private bunch.
This is the key, and as you see, the lock is a Yale lock."

He held up the bunch with the little flat key separated, for the
coroner's and the jurymen's inspection.

"But," said the coroner, "you have not made it clear that a mistake in
the quantity was impossible."

"I was coming to that." replied Dimsdale. "The poisons in the cupboard
are, of course, powerful drugs which are given only in small doses, and a
special measure-glass is kept in the cupboard to measure them. This glass
holds only two drachms--a hundred and twenty minims, that is, a quarter
of an ounce. Now, the analysts found in this bottle three fluid ounces of
Fowler's Solution. But to measure out that quantity, I should have had to
fill the measure-glass twelve times! That is impossible. No one could do
such a thing as that inadvertently, especially when he was dispensing
poisons.

"But that is not all. The poison bottles are all quite small. The one in
which the Liquor Arsenicalis is kept is a four ounce bottle. It happened
that I had refilled it a few days previously and it was full when I
dispensed this medicine. Now, obviously, if I had put three ounces of the
Liquor into the medicine bottle, there would have remained in the
dispensing bottle only one ounce. But the dispensing bottle is still
practically full. I had occasion to use it this morning and I found it
full save for the few minims that had been taken to make up the
deceased's medicine.

"And there is another point. This medicine was coloured a deepish pink by
the Tincture of Cardamoms. But if it had contained three ounces of
Fowlers Solution in addition, it would have been a deep red of quite a
different character. But I clearly remember the appearance of the bottle
as it lay on the white paper when I was wrapping it up. It had the
delicate pink colour that is imparted by the cochineal in the Tincture of
Cardamoms."

The coroner nodded as he wrote down the reply, and enquired:

"Would any of you, gentlemen, like to ask any questions concerning the
bottle of medicine?"

"We should like to know. Sir," said the foreman, "whether this bottle of
medicine ever left the doctor's hands before it was sent to deceased?"

"No, it did not," replied Dimsdale. "As the dispenser was absent, I put
up the bottle entirely myself. I put in the cork, wrote the label, tied
on the paper cap, wrapped the bottle up, sealed the wrapping, addressed
it and gave it to the boy to deliver."

The foreman expressed himself as fully satisfied with this answer and the
coroner then resumed: "Well, we seem to have disposed of the medicine so
far as you are concerned, Doctor. We will now go on to consider the
condition of deceased during the last few days. Did no suspicion of
anything abnormal ever occur to you?"

"No, I neither perceived nor suspected anything abnormal."

"Is that not rather remarkable? I realize that poisoning would be the
last thing that you would be looking for or expecting. But when it
occurred, is it not a little strange that you did not recognize the
symptoms?"

"Not at all," replied Dimsdale. "There was nothing to recognize. The
classical symptoms of arsenic poisoning were entirely absent. You will
remember that Sir Robert Detling had no more suspicion than I had."

"What are the classical symptoms, as you call them, of arsenic
poisoning?"

"The recognized symptoms--which are present in the immense majority of
cases--are acute abdominal pain and tenderness, intense thirst, nausea,
vomiting and purging: the symptoms, in fact, of extreme irritation of the
stomach and intestines. But in the case of deceased, these symptoms were
entirely absent. There was, in my opinion, nothing whatever in his
appearance or symptoms to suggest arsenic poisoning. His condition
appeared in no way different from what I had known it to be on several
previous occasions; just a variation for the worse of his ordinary
ill-health."

"You do not doubt that arsenic poisoning was really the cause of his
death?"

"The analysis seems to put the matter beyond question; otherwise--I mean
apart from the analysis--I would not have entertained the idea of arsenic
poisoning for a moment."

"But you do not dispute the cause of death?"

"No. Arsenic is extraordinarily variable in its effects, as Dr Randall
mentioned, both on the dead body and on the living. Very anomalous cases
of arsenic poisoning have been mistaken, during life, for opium
poisoning."

The coroner wrote down the answer and having glanced over his notes,
asked: "What was the condition of deceased when his wife went away from
home?"

"He was much better. In fact his health seemed to be improving so much
that I hoped he would soon be about again."

"And how soon after his wife's departure did his last attack begin?"

"I should hardly call it an attack. It was a gradual change for the
worse. Mrs Monkhouse went away on the 29th of August. On the 2nd of
September deceased was not so well and was extremely depressed and
disappointed at the relapse. From that time his condition fluctuated,
sometimes a little better and sometimes not so well. On the 8th he
appeared rather seriously ill and was no better on the 9th, the day of
the consultation with Sir Robert Detling After that he seemed to improve
a little, and the slight improvement was maintained up to the 12th. His
death came, at least to me, as quite a surprise."

"You spoke just now of several previous occasions on which attacks--or,
if you prefer it, relapses--of a similar kind occurred. Looking back
on those relapses by the light of what we now know, do you say that they
were quite similar, in respect of the symptoms, to the one which ended in
the death of deceased?"

"I should say they were identically similar. At any rate, I can recall no
difference."

"Did any of them seem to be as severe as the fatal one?"

"Yes; in fact the last of them--which occurred in June--seemed to be more
severe, only that it was followed by improvement and recovery. I have
here the section of my card-index which relates to deceased. In the entry
dated June 19 you will see that I have noted the patient's unsatisfactory
condition."

He handed a small pack of index-cards to the coroner, who examined the
upper card intently and then, with a sudden raising of the eyebrows,
addressed the jury.

"I had better read out the entry. The card is headed 'Harold Monkhouse'
and this entry reads: 'June 19. Patient very low and feeble. No appetite.
Considerable gastric discomfort and troublesome cough. Pulse 90, small,
thready. Heart sounds weak. Sending report to Mrs Monkhouse. '"

He laid the cards down on the table, and, looking fixedly at Dimsdale,
repeated: "'Sending report to Mrs Monkhouse?' Where was Mrs Monkhouse?"

"Somewhere in Kent, I believe. I sent the report to the headquarters of
the Women's Freedom League in Knightrider Street, Maidstone, from whence
I supposed it would be forwarded to her."

For some seconds after receiving this answer the coroner continued to
gaze steadily at the witness. At length he observed: "This is a
remarkable coincidence. Can you recall the condition of deceased when Mrs
Monkhouse went away on that occasion?"

"Yes. I remember that he was in comparatively good health. In fact, his
improved condition furnished the opportunity for Mrs Monkhouse to make
her visit to Maidstone."

"Can you tell us how soon after her departure on that occasion the
relapse occurred?"

"I cannot say definitely, but my impression is that the change for the
worse began a few days after she went away. Perhaps I might be able to
judge by looking at my notes."

The coroner handed him back the index-cards, which he looked through
rapidly. "Yes," he said, at length, "here is an entry on June 11 of a
bottle of tonic medicine for Mrs Monkhouse. So she must have been at home
on that date; and as it was a double-sized bottle, it was probably for
her to take away with her."

"Then," said the coroner, "it is clear that, on the last two occasions,
the deceased was comparatively well when his wife left home, but had a
serious relapse soon after she went away. Now, what of the previous
relapses?"

"I am afraid I cannot remember. I have an impression that Mrs Monkhouse
was away from home when some of them occurred, but at this distance of
time, I cannot recollect clearly. Possibly Mrs Monkhouse, herself, may be
able to remember."


"Possibly," the coroner agreed, rather drily, "but as the point is of
considerable importance, I should be glad if you would presently look
through your case cards and see if you can glean any definite information
on the subject. Meanwhile we may pass on to one or two other matters.
First as to the medicine which you prescribed for deceased; it contained,
as you have told us, a certain amount of Fowler's Solution, and you
considered deceased to be suffering from chronic gastritis. Is Fowler's
Solution usually given in cases of gastritis?"

"No. It is usually considered rather unsuitable. But deceased was very
tolerant of small doses of arsenic. I had often given it to him before as
a tonic and it had always seemed to agree with him. The dose was
extremely small--only two minims."

"How long have you known deceased?"

"I have known, and attended him professionally about twenty years."

"From your knowledge of him, should you say that he was a man who was
likely to make enemies?"

"Not at all. He was a kindly, just and generous man, amiable and
even-tempered; rather reserved and aloof; not very human, perhaps, and
somewhat self-contained and solitary. But I could not imagine him making
an enemy and, so far as I know, he never did."

The coroner reflected awhile after writing down this answer and then
turned to the jury.

"Are there any questions that you wish to put to the witness, gentlemen?"

The jury consulted together for a few moments, and the foreman then
replied: "We should like to know, Sir, if possible, whether Mrs Monkhouse
was or was not away from home when the previous relapses occurred."

"I am afraid," said Dimsdale, "that I cannot be more explicit as the
events occurred so long ago. The other witnesses--the members of the
household--would be much more likely to remember. And I would urge you
not to detain me from my professional duties longer than is absolutely
necessary."

Hereupon a brief consultation took place between the coroner and the
jury, with the result that Dimsdale was allowed to go about his business
and Barbara was summoned to take his place. I had awaited this stage of
the proceedings with some uneasiness and was now rather surprised and
greatly relieved at the coroner's manner towards her; which was courteous
and even sympathetic. Having expressed his and the jury's regret at
having to trouble her in the very distressing circumstances, he proceeded
at once to clear off the preliminaries, eliciting the facts that she was
32 years of age and had been married a little over three years, and then
said: "Dr Dimsdale has told us that on the occasion of the attack or
relapse in June last you were away from home, but he is not certain about
the previous ones. Can you give us any information on the subject?"

"Yes" she replied, in a quiet, steady voice, "I recall quite clearly at
least three previous occasions on which I went away from home leaving my
husband apparently well--as well as he ever was--and came back to find
him quite ill. But I think there were more than three occasions on which
this happened, for I remember having once accused him, facetiously, of
saving up his illnesses until I was out of the house."

"Can you remember if a serious relapse ever occurred when you were at
home?"

"Not a really serious one. My husband's health was always very unstable
and he often had to rest in bed for a day or two. But the really bad
attacks of illness seem always to have occurred when I was away from
home."

"Did it never strike you that this was a very remarkable fact?"

"I am afraid I did not give the matter as much consideration as I ought
to have done. Deceased was always ailing, more or less, and those about
him came to accept ill-health as his normal condition."

"But you see the significance of it now?"

Barbara hesitated and then replied in a low voice and with evident
agitation: "I see that it may have some significance, but I don't in the
least understand it. I am quite overwhelmed and bewildered by the
dreadful thing that has happened."

"Naturally, you are," the coroner said in a sympathetic tone, "and I am
most reluctant to trouble you with questions under circumstances that
must be so terrible to you. But we must find out the truth if we can."

"Yes, I realize that," she replied, "and thank you for your
consideration."

The coroner bowed, and after a brief pause, asked: "Did it never occur to
you to engage a nurse to attend to deceased?"

"Yes. I suggested it more than once to deceased, but he wouldn't hear of
it. And I think he was right. There was nothing that a nurse could have
done for him. He was not helpless and he was not continuously bed-ridden.
He had a bell-push by his bedside and his secretary or the servants were
always ready to do anything that he wanted done. The housemaid was most
attentive to him. But he did not want much attention. He kept the books
that he was reading on his bedside table and he liked to be left alone to
read in peace. He felt that the presence of a nurse would have been
disturbing."

"And at night?"

"At night his bell-push was connected with a bell in the secretary's
bedroom. But he hardly ever used it. If his candle-lamp burned out he
could put in a fresh candle from the box on his table; and he never
seemed to want anything else."

"Besides deceased and yourself, who were the inmates of the house?"

"There was my husband's secretary, Mr Wallingford, Miss Norris, the cook,
Anne Baker, the housemaid, Mabel Withers, and the kitchenmaid, Doris
Brown."

"Why did deceased need a secretary? Did he transact much business?"

"No. The secretary wrote his few business letters, kept the accounts and
executed any commissions, besides doing the various things that the
master of the house would ordinarily have done. He is the son of an old
friend of my husband's, and he came to us when his father died."

"And Miss Norris? What was her position in the household?"

"She lived with us as a guest at my husband's invitation. She was the
daughter of his first wife's sister, and he, more or less informally,
adopted her as he had no children of his own."

"Deceased was a widower, then, when you married him?"

"Yes. His wife had been dead about two years."

"What was his age when he died?"

"He had just turned fifty-seven."

 "On what sort of terms was deceased with the members of his household?"

"On the best of terms with them all. He was an undemonstrative man and
rather cool and reserved with strangers and distinctly solitary and
self-contained. But he was a kind and generous man and all the household,
including the servants, were devoted to him."

"Was deceased engaged in any business or profession?"

"No, he had independent means, inherited from his father."

"Would you describe him as a wealthy man?"

"I believe he was quite well off, but he never spoke of his financial
affairs to me, or to anybody but his lawyers."

"Do you know how his property is disposed of?"

"I know that he made a will, but I never enquired about the terms of it
and he never told me."

"But surely you were an interested party."

"It was understood that some provision would be made for me if I survived
him. That was all that concerned me. Deceased was not a man with whom it
was necessary to make conditions; and I have some small property of my
own. Mr Mayfield, who is present, of course, knows what the provisions of
the will are as he is one of the executors."

Once more the coroner paused to look over his notes. Then he glanced
inquiringly at the jury, and, when the foreman shook his head, he thanked
Barbara and dismissed her; and as she walked back to her chair, pale and
grave but perfectly composed, I found myself admiring her calm dignity
and only hoping that the other witnesses would make as good a figure. But
this hope was no sooner conceived than it was shattered. The next name
that was called was Madeline Norris and for a few moments there was no
response. At length Madeline rose slowly, ashen and ghastly of face, and
walked unsteadily to the table. Her appearance--her deathly pallor and
her trembling hands--struck me with dismay; and what increased my concern
for the unfortunate girl was the subtle change in manner that I detected
in the jury and the coroner. The poor girl's manifest agitation might
surely have bespoken their sympathy; but not a sign of sympathy was
discernible in their faces--nothing but a stony curiosity.

Having been sworn--on a testament which shook visibly in her grasp--she
deposed that her name was Madeline Norris and her age twenty-seven.

"Any occupation?" the coroner enquired drily without looking up.

"I am a teacher at the Westminster College of Domestic Science."

"Teacher of what?"

"Principally of cookery and kitchen management, especially invalid
cookery."

"Are you, yourself, a skilled cook?"

"Yes. It is my duty to demonstrate to the class."

"Have you ever cooked or prepared food for the deceased?"

"Yes. I usually cooked his meals when I was in the house at meal times."

"It has been stated that you prepared the last meal that deceased took.
Is that correct?"

"Yes. I cooked an omelette for his supper."

"Will you describe to us the way in which you prepared that omelette?"

Madeline considered for a few moments and then replied in a low, shaky
voice: "It was just a simple omelette. I first rubbed the pan with a cut
clove of garlic and put in the butter to heat. Then I broke an egg into a
cup, separated the yolk from the white, and, having beaten them up
separately, mixed them and added a very small portion of pounded anchovy,
a pinch or two of finely chopped parsley and a little salt. I cooked it
in the usual way and turned it out on a hot plate winch I covered at
once."

"Who took it up to deceased?"

"I did. I ran straight up with it and sat and talked to deceased while he
ate it."

"Did you meet anyone on your way up or in the bedroom?"

"No. There was nobody on the stairs, and, the deceased was alone."

"Did deceased take anything to drink with his supper?"

"Yes. He had a glass of chablis. I fetched the bottle and the glass from
the dining room and poured out the wine for him."

"Did you meet anybody in the dining room or coming or going?"

"No, I met nobody."

"Can you think of any way in which any poison could have got into the
omelette or into the wine?"

"No. Nothing could possibly have got into the omelette. As to the wine, I
poured it from the bottle into a clean glass. But the bottle was already
open and had been in the cellaret since lunch."

"Now, with regard to the medicine. Did you give deceased any on the day
before his death?"

"Yes. I gave him a dose soon after I came in--about six o'clock. That was
the last dose in the bottle."

"Did you notice anything unusual about the medicine?"

"No. It was similar to what he had been taking for some days past."

"What was the medicine like?"

"It was nearly colourless with the faintest tinge of red and smelled
slightly of lavender and bitter orange."

"Was there anything that caused you to notice particularly, on this
occasion, the appearance and smell of the medicine?"

"No. I noticed the colour and the smell when I opened the bottle on the
previous morning to give deceased a dose."

"Did you examine the new bottle which had just been sent?"

"Yes; I looked at it and took out the cork and smelled it and tasted it."

"What made you do that?"

"I noticed that it seemed to contain Tincture of Cardamoms and I smelled
and tasted it to find out if the other ingredients had been changed."

"And what conclusion did you arrive at?"

"That they had not been changed. I could taste the Nux Vomica and smell
the orange and the Liquor Arsenicalis--at least the lavender"

"Did you realize what the lavender smell was due to?"

"Yes. I recognized it as the smell of Liquor Arsenicalis. I knew that
deceased was taking Liquor Arsenicalis because I had asked Dr Dimsdale
about it when I first noticed the smell."

The coroner wrote down this answer and then, raising his head, looked
steadily at Madeline for some seconds without speaking; and the jury
looked harder still. At length the former spoke, slowly, deliberately,
emphatically.

"You have told us that you examined this medicine to find out what it
contained, and that you were able to recognize Tincture of Cardamoms by
its colour and Liquor Arsenicalis by its smell. It would seem, then, that
you know a good deal about drugs. Is that so?"

"I know something about drugs. My father was a doctor and he taught me
simple dispensing so that I could help him."

The coroner nodded. "Was there any reason why you should have taken so
much interest in the composition of deceased's medicine?"

Madeline did not answer immediately. And as she stood trembling and
hesitating in evident confusion, the coroner gazed at her stonily, and
the jury craned forward to catch her reply.

"I used to examine his medicine," she replied at length, in a low voice
and a reluctant and confused manner, "because I knew that it often
contained Liquor Arsenicalis and I used to wonder whether that was good
for him. I understood from my father that it was a rather irritating
drug, and it did not seem very suitable for a patient who suffered from
gastritis."

There was a pause after she had spoken and something in the appearance of
the inquisitors almost as if they had been a little disappointed by this
eminently reasonable answer. At length the coroner broke the silence by
asking, with a slight softening of manner:

"You have said that the change in colour of the last medicine led you to
taste and smell it to ascertain if the other ingredients had been
changed. You have said that you decided that they had not been changed.
Are you sure of that? Can you swear that the smell of lavender was not
stronger in this bottle than in the previous ones?"

"It did not seem to me to be stronger."

"Supposing the bottle had then contained as much Liquor Arsenicalis as
was found in it by the analysts, would you have been able to detect it by
the smell or otherwise?"

"Yes, I feel sure that I should. The analysts found three ounces of
Liquor Arsenicalis; that would be nearly half the bottle. I am sure I
should have detected that amount, not only by the strong smell but by the
colour, too."

"You are sure that the colour of this medicine was due to Cardamoms
only?"

"Yes, that is to cochineal. I recognized it at once. It is perfectly
unmistakable and quite different from the colour of Red Sandalwood, with
which Liquor Arsenicalis is coloured. Besides, this medicine was only a
deepish pink in colour. But if three ounces of Liquor Arsenicalis had
been in the bottle, the medicine would have been quite a dark red."

"You have had some experience in dispensing. Do you consider it possible
that the Liquor Arsenicalis could have been put into the medicine by
mistake when it was being made up?"

"It would be quite impossible if a minim measure-glass was used, as the
glass would have had to be filled twelve times. But this is never done.
One does not measure large quantities in small measures. Three ounces
would be measured out in a four or five ounce measure, as a rule, or,
possibly in a two ounce measure, by half refilling it."

"Might not the wrong measure-glass have been taken up by mistake?"

"That is, of course, just possible. But it is most unlikely; for the
great disproportion between the large measure-glass and the little
stock-bottle would be so striking that it could hardly fail to be
noticed."

"Then, from your own observation and from Dr Dimsdale's evidence, you
reject the idea that a mistake may have been made in dispensing this
bottle of medicine?"

"Yes, entirely. I have heard Dr Dimsdale's evidence and I examined the
medicine. I am convinced that he could not have made a mistake under the
circumstances that he described and I am certain that the medicine that I
saw did not contain more than a small quantity--less than a drachm--of
Liquor Arsenicalis."

"You are not forgetting that the analysts actually found the equivalent
of three ounces of Liquor Arsenicalis in the bottle?"

"No. But I am sure it was not there when I examined the bottle."

The coroner wrote down this answer with a deliberate air, and, when he
had finished, turned to the jury.

"I think we have nothing more to ask this witness, unless there is any
point that you want made more clear."

There was a brief silence. Then the super-intelligent juryman interposed.

"I should like to know if this witness ever had any Liquor Arsenicalis in
her possession."

The coroner held up a warning hand to Madeline, and replied:

"That question, Sir, is not admissible. It is a principle of English law
that a witness cannot be compelled to make a statement incriminating
him--or herself. But an affirmative answer to this question would be an
incriminating statement."

"But I am perfectly willing to answer the question," Madeline said
eagerly. "I have never had in my possession any Liquor Arsenicalis or any
other preparation of arsenic."

"That answers your question, Sir," said the coroner, as he wrote down the
answer, "and if you have nothing more to ask, we can release the
witness."

He handed his pen to Madeline, and when she had signed her depositions-a
terribly shaky signature it must have been-she came back to her chair,
still very pale and agitated, but obviously relieved at having got
through the ordeal. I had taken her arm as she sat down and was
complimenting her on the really admirable way in which she had given her
evidence, when I heard the name of Anthony Wallingford called and
realized that another unpleasant episode had arrived.



CHAPTER SIX

THE VERDICT

I had not been taking much notice of Wallingford, my attention being
occupied with the two women when it strayed from the proceedings. Beyond
an irritated consciousness of his usual restless movements, I had no
information as to how the soul-shaking incidents of this appalling day
were affecting him. But when he rose drunkenly and, grasping the back of
his chair, rolled his eyes wildly round the Court, I realized that there
were breakers ahead.

When I say that he rose drunkenly, I use the word advisedly. Familiar as
I was with his peculiarities--his jerkings, twitchings and grimacings--I
saw, at once, that there was something unusual both in his face and in
his bearing; a dull wildness of expression and an uncertainty of movement
that I had never observed before. He had not come to the Court with the
rest of us, preferring, for some reason, to come alone. And I now
suspected that he had taken the opportunity to fortify himself on the
way.

I was not the only observer of his condition. As he walked, with
deliberate care, from his seat to the table, I noticed the coroner eyeing
him critically and the jury exchanging dubious glances and whispered
comments. He made a bad start by dropping the book on the floor and
sniggering nervously as he stooped to pick it up; and I could see
plainly, by the stiffness of the coroner's manner that he had made an
unfavourable impression before he began his evidence.

"You were secretary to the deceased?" said the coroner, when the witness
had stated his name, age (33) and occupation. "What was the nature of
your duties?"

"The ordinary duties of a secretary," was the dogged reply.

"Will you kindly give us particulars of what you did for deceased?"

"I opened his business letters and answered them and some of his private
ones. And I kept his accounts and paid his bills."

"What accounts would those be? Deceased was not in business, I
understand?"

"No, they were his domestic accounts; his income from investments and
rents and his expenditure."

"Did you attend upon deceased personally; I mean in the way of looking
after his bodily comfort and supplying his needs?"

"I used to look in on him from time to time to see if he wanted anything
done. But it wasn't my business to wait on him. I was his secretary, not
his valet."

"Who did wait on him, and attend to his wants?"

"The housemaid, chiefly, and Miss Norris, and of course, Mrs Monkhouse.
But he didn't usually want much but his food, his medicine, a few books
from the library and a supply of candles for his lamp. His bell-push was
connected with a bell in my room at night, but he never rang it."

"Then, practically, the housemaid did everything for him?"

"Not everything. Miss Norris cooked most of his meals, we all used to
give him his medicine, I used to put out his books and keep his fountain
pen filled, and Mrs Monkhouse kept his candle-box; supplied. That was
what he was most particular about as he slept badly and used to read at
night."

"You give us the impression, Mr Wallingford," the coroner said, drily,
"that you must have had a good deal of leisure."

"Then I have given you the wrong impression. I was kept constantly on the
go, doing jobs, paying tradesmen, shopping and running errands."

"For whom?"

"Everybody. Deceased, Mrs Monkhouse, Miss Norris and even Dr Dimsdale. I
was everybody's servant."

"What did you do for Mrs Monkhouse?"

"I don't see what that has got to do with this inquest?"

"That is not for you to decide," the coroner said, sternly. "You will be
good enough to answer my question."

Wallingford winced as if he had had his ears cuffed. In a moment, his
insolence evaporated and I could see his hands shaking as he, evidently,
cudgelled his brains for a reply. Suddenly he seemed to have struck an
idea.

"Shopping of various kinds," said he; "for instance, there were the
candles for deceased. His lamp was of German make and English
lamp-candles wouldn't fit it. So I used to have to go to a German shop at
Sparrow Corner by the Tower, to get packets of Schneider's stearine
candles. That took about half a day."

The coroner, stolidly and without comment, wrote down the answer, but my
experience as a counsel told me that it had been a dummy question, asked
to distract the witness's attention and cover a more significant one that
was to follow. For that question I waited expectantly, and when it came
my surmise was confirmed.

"And Dr Dimsdale? What did you have to do for him?"

"I used to help him with his books sometimes when he hadn't got a
dispenser. I am a pretty good accountant and he isn't."

"Where does Dr Dimsdale do his bookkeeping?"

"At the desk in the surgery."

"And is that where you used to work?"

"Yes."

"Used Dr Dimsdale to work with you or did you do the books by yourself?"

"I usually worked by myself."

"At what time in the day used you to work there?"

"In the afternoon, as a rule."

"At what hours does Dr Dimsdale visit his patients?"

"Most of the day He goes out about ten and finishes about six or seven."

"So that you would usually be alone in the surgery?"

"Yes, usually."

As the coroner wrote down the answer I noticed the super-intelligent
juryman fidgeting in his seat. At length he burst out: "Is the poison
cupboard in the surgery?"

The coroner looked interrogatively at Wallingford, who stared at him
blankly in sudden confusion.

"You heard the question? Is the poison cupboard there?"

"I don't know. It may be. It wasn't any business of mine."

"Is there any cupboard in the surgery? You must know that."

"Yes, there is a cupboard there, but I don't know what is in it."

"Did you never see it open?"

"No. Never."

"And you never had the curiosity to look into it?"

"Of course I didn't. Besides I couldn't. It was locked."

"Was it always locked when you were there?"

"Yes, always."

"Are you certain of that?"

"Yes, perfectly certain."

Here the super-intelligent juror looked as if he were about to spring
across the table as he demanded eagerly: "How does the witness know that
that cupboard was locked?"

The coroner looked slightly annoyed. He had been playing his fish
carefully and was in no wise helped by this rude jerk of the line.
Nevertheless, he laid down his pen and looked expectantly at the witness.
As for Wallingford, he was struck speechless. Apparently his rather
muddled brain had suddenly taken in the import of the question, for he
stood with dropped jaw and damp, pallid face, staring at the juryman in
utter consternation.

"Well," said the coroner, after an interval, "how did you know that it
was locked?"

Wallingford pulled himself together by an effort and replied: "Why, I
knew--I knew, of course, that it must be locked."

"Yes; but the question is, how did you know?"

"Why it stands to reason that it must have been locked."

"Why does it stand to reason? Cupboards are not always locked."

"Poison cupboards are. Besides, you heard Dimsdale say that he always
kept this cupboard locked. He showed you the key."

Once more the coroner, having noted the answer, laid down his pen and
looked steadily at the witness.

"Now, Mr Wallingford," said he, "I must caution you to be careful as to
what you say. This is a serious matter, and you are giving evidence on
oath. You said just now that you did not know whether the poison cupboard
was or was not in the surgery. You said that you did not know what was in
that cupboard. Now you say that you knew the cupboard must have been
locked because it was the poison cupboard. Then it seems that you did
know that it was the poison cupboard. Isn't that so?"

"No. I didn't know then. I do now because I heard Dimsdale say that it
was."

"Then, you said that you were perfectly certain that the cupboard was
always locked whenever you were working there. That meant that you knew
positively, as a fact, that it was locked. Now you say that you knew that
it must be locked. But that is an assumption, an opinion, a belief. Now,
a man of your education must know the difference between a mere belief
and actual knowledge. Will you, please, answer definitely: Did you, or
did you not, know as a fact whether that cupboard was or was not locked?"

"Well, I didn't actually know, but I took it for granted that it was
locked."

"You did not try the door?"

"Certainly not. Why should I?"

"Very well. Does any gentleman of the jury wish to ask any further
questions about this cupboard?"

There was a brief silence. Then the foreman said: "We should like the
witness to say what he means and not keep contradicting himself."

"You hear that, Sir," said the coroner. "Please be more careful in your
answers in future. Now, I want to ask you about that last bottle of
medicine. Did you notice anything unusual in its appearance?"

"No. I didn't notice it at all. I didn't know that it had come."

"Did you go into deceased's room on that day--the Wednesday?"

"Yes, I went to see deceased in the morning about ten o'clock and gave
him a dose of his medicine; and I looked in on him in the evening about
nine o'clock to see if he wanted anything, but he didn't."

"Did you give him any medicine then?"

"No. It was not due for another hour."

"What was his condition then?"

"He looked about the same as usual. He seemed inclined to doze, so I did
not stay long."

"Is that the last time you saw him alive?"

"No. I looked in again just before eleven. He was then in much the same
state--rather drowsy--and, at his request, I turned out the gas and left
him."

"Did you light the candle?"

"No, he always did that himself, if he wanted it."

"Did you give him any medicine?"

"No. He had just had a dose."

"Did he tell you that he had?"

"No. I could see that there was a dose gone."

"From which bottle was that?"

"There was only one bottle there. It must have been the new bottle, as
only one dose had been taken."

"What colour was the medicine?"

Wallingford hesitated a moment or two as if suspecting a trap. Then he
replied, doggedly: "I don't know. I told you I didn't notice it."

"You said that you didn't notice it at all and didn't know that it had
come. Now you say that you observed that only one dose had been taken
from it and that you inferred that it was the new bottle. Which of those
statements is the true one?"

"They are both true," Wallingford protested in a whining tone. "I meant
that I didn't notice the medicine particularly and that I didn't know
when it came."

"That is not what you said," the coroner rejoined. "However, we will let
that pass. Is there anything more that you wish to ask this witness,
gentlemen? If not, we will release him and take the evidence of Mr
Mayfield."

I think the jury would have liked to bait Wallingford but apparently
could not think of any suitable questions. But they watched him
malevolently as he added his--probably quite illegible--signature to his
depositions and followed him with their eyes as he tottered shakily back
to his seat. Immediately afterwards my name was called and I took my
place at the table, not without a slight degree of nervousness; for,
though I was well enough used to examinations, it was in the capacity of
examiner, not of witness, and I was fully alive to the possibility of
certain pitfalls which the coroner might, if he were wide enough awake,
dig for me. However, when I had been sworn and had given my particulars
(Rupert Mayfield, 35, Barrister-at-Law, of No. 64 Fig Tree Court, Inner
Temple) the coroner's conciliatory manner led me to hope that it would be
all plain sailing.

"How long have you known deceased?" was the first question.

"About two and a half years," I replied.

"You are one of the executors of his will, Mrs Monkhouse has told us."

"Yes."

"Do you know why you were appointed executor after so short an
acquaintance?"

"I am an old friend of Mrs Monkhouse. I have known her since she was a
little girl. I was a friend of her father--or rather, her stepfather."

"Was it by her wish that you were made executor?"

"I believe that the suggestion came from the deceased's family solicitor,
Mr Brodribb, who is my co-executor. But probably he was influenced by my
long acquaintance with Mrs Monkhouse."

"Has probate been applied for?"

"Yes."

"Then there can be no objections to your disclosing the provisions of the
will. We don't want to hear them in detail, but I will ask you to give us
a general idea of the disposal of deceased's property."

"The gross value of the estate is about fifty-five thousand pounds, of
which twelve thousand represents real property and forty-three thousand
personal. The principal beneficiaries are: Mrs Monkhouse, who receives a
house valued at four thousand pounds and twenty thousand pounds in money
and securities; the Reverend Amos Monkhouse, land of the value of five
thousand and ten thousand invested money; Madeline Norris, a house and
land valued at three thousand and five thousand in securities; Anthony
Wallingford, four thousand pounds. Then there are legacies of a thousand
pounds each to the two executors, and of three hundred, two hundred and
one hundred respectively to the housemaid, the cook and the kitchen-maid.
That accounts for the bulk of the estate. Mrs Monkhouse is the residuary
legatee."

The coroner wrote down the answer as I gave it and then read it out
slowly for me to confirm, working out, at the same time, a little sum on
a spare piece of paper--as did also the intellectual juryman.

"I think that gives us all the information we want," the former remarked,
glancing at the jury; and as none of them made any comment, he proceeded:
"Did you see much of deceased during the last few months?"

"I saw him usually once or twice a week. Sometimes oftener. But I did not
spend much time with him. He was a solitary, bookish man who preferred to
be alone most of his time."

"Did you take particular notice of his state of health?"

"No, but I did observe that his health seemed to grow rather worse
lately."

"Did it appear to you that he received such care and attention as a man
in his condition ought to have received?"

"It did not appear to me that he was neglected."

'D